#2 flags field in each specific device of new domctl would control
whether this device need to check/reserve its own RMRR range. But its
not dependent on current device assignment domctl, so the user can use
them to control which devices need to work as hotplug later, separately.
And this could
On 2014/11/12 17:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 09:45, tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
#2 flags field in each specific device of new domctl would control
whether this device need to check/reserve its own RMRR range. But its
not dependent on current device assignment domctl, so the user can
On 12.11.14 at 07:58, robert...@intel.com wrote:
2. Failed to hotplug a VT-d device with XEN4.5-RC1
http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1894
First of all I'm not sure it is really useful to use the old, discontinued
bugzilla to report bugs. I think it would be
Am Dienstag 11 November 2014, 15:21:01 schrieb Juergen Gross:
Hi again,
On 11/11/2014 01:18 PM, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
Hi list,
When creating a cpupool, starting and destroying a guest within this pool,
then removing this pool doesn't work because of EBUSY.
It seems the cause of this
On 12.11.14 at 10:13, tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
On 2014/11/12 17:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 09:45, tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
#2 flags field in each specific device of new domctl would control
whether this device need to check/reserve its own RMRR range. But its
not dependent
Il 12/11/2014 07:58, Hu, Robert ha scritto:
Hi All,
This is a bug summary for Xen 4.5-rc1 on Intel Server platforms.
Test environment:
Xen: Xen 4.5-rc1
Dom0: Linux kernel 3.17.0
Hardware: Intel IVT-EX, Haswell-EP, BDW Client, HSW-EX, IVT-EX, HSW-UP
New bugs(9):
1. with xen_platform_pci=0
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 13:46 +, Wei Liu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: George Dunlap george.dun...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: Konrad Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
---
This is a simple enough
On 12/11/14 09:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 02:37, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
When we PCI insert an device, the BARs are not set at all - and hence
the Linux kernel is the one that tries to set the BARs in. The
reason it cannot fit the device in the MMIO region is due to the
_CRS
Il 06/11/2014 16:12, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Il 03/11/2014 17:03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:05:44PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 31/10/2014 15:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha scritto:
I always posted all versions of the patch in xen-devel, the latest
was
On 2014/11/12 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 11:18, tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
On 2014/11/12 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 04:05, tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
I don't see any feedback to this point, so I think you still prefer we
should do all check in the callback
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 19:41 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Here, I'm trying to fix the way that osstest gets far too obsessed
about particular failing hosts.
All fine by me, not that I've really grokked the bits towards the end.
(I will try to if you want)
1/9 cs-adjust-flight: Fix doc about
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:01:24AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 13:46 +, Wei Liu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: George Dunlap george.dun...@eu.citrix.com
Cc:
Am Mittwoch 12 November 2014, 11:25:14 schrieb Juergen Gross:
On 11/12/2014 10:53 AM, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
Am Dienstag 11 November 2014, 15:21:01 schrieb Juergen Gross:
Hi again,
On 11/11/2014 01:18 PM, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
Hi list,
When creating a cpupool, starting and destroying a
... otherwise when device add operation fails, the error message looks
like libxl: error: libxl.c:1897:device_addrm_aocomplete: unable to (null)
device, which is not very helpful.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson
On 12/11/14 10:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 11:01, malcolm.cross...@citrix.com wrote:
As for the CRS regions: These typically describe the BIOS set limits in
hardware configuration for the MMIO hole itself. On single socket
systems anything which isn't RAM or another predefined region
Best Regards,
Robert Ho
-Original Message-
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Hu, Robert
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Subject: Re: [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1
On 12.11.14 at 07:58,
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:39 +, Wei Liu wrote:
... otherwise when device add operation fails, the error message looks
like libxl: error: libxl.c:1897:device_addrm_aocomplete: unable to (null)
device, which is not very helpful.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Acked-by:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 21:24 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:28:38PM +, M A Young wrote:
The build of xen-4.5.0-rc2 fails if XSM_ENABLE=y due to an inconsistency in
commit fda1614 xen/arm: Add support for GICv3 for domU which uses
And of course this is v2 of this patch. Sorry for not having added that
in the subject line.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 12.11.14 at 11:46, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 12/11/14 10:40, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/xen/common/cpupool.c
+++ b/xen/common/cpupool.c
@@ -225,6 +225,35 @@ static int cpupool_destroy(struct cpupool *c)
}
/*
+ * Move domain to another cpupool
+ */
+static int
On 11/12/2014 11:46 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/11/14 10:40, Juergen Gross wrote:
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding the number of domains. The number of domains
is nor
The `if' statement considered return value 0 from libxl_domain_info an
error, while 0 actually means success.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
---
This is a bug fix for PSR feature. This feature was added
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:58:49AM +, Hu, Robert wrote:
Hi All,
This is a bug summary for Xen 4.5-rc1 on Intel Server platforms.
9. xl psr-cmt-show cache_occupancy $dom_id will report error
http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1901
See
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding the number of domains. The number of domains
is nor adjusted when a domain is moved to cpupool0 in kill_domain().
Correct this by introducing
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Juergen Gross jgr...@suse.com wrote:
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding the number of domains. The number of domains
is nor adjusted when a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Juergen Gross jgr...@suse.com wrote:
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding the number of domains. The number of domains
is nor adjusted when a
CCing the folks who signed-of-by is on the original patch
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 11:05 +, Wei Liu wrote:
The `if' statement considered return value 0 from libxl_domain_info an
error, while 0 actually means success.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell
You forgot to add the release manager... I've done that for you.
In 1413279117.1497.25.ca...@citrix.com I said:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Is this a bug fix or a feature? What are the risks? IsLKonrad OK with
it?
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 12:06 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On 11/12/2014 12:10 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Juergen Gross jgr...@suse.com wrote:
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding the number of domains.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:42:04AM -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:41:32AM -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 11/11/2014 06:01 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:54:18PM -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
[...]
Could you please
Introduce a boolean flag and an accessor function to check whether a
device is dma_coherent. Set the flag from set_arch_dma_coherent_ops.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas
Dom0 is not actually capable of issuing outer_inv_range or
outer_clean_range calls.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
---
arch/arm/xen/mm32.c |9 -
1
dev_addr is the machine address of the page.
The new parameter can be used by the ARM and ARM64 implementations of
xen_dma_map_page to find out if the page is a local page (pfn == mfn) or
a foreign page (pfn != mfn).
dev_addr could be retrieved again from the physical address, using
pfn_to_mfn,
Introduce an arch specific function to find out whether a particular dma
mapping operation needs to bounce on the swiotlb buffer.
On ARM and ARM64, if the page involved is a foreign page and the device
is not coherent, we need to bounce because at unmap time we cannot
execute any required cache
Merge xen/mm32.c into xen/mm.c.
As a consequence the code gets compiled on arm64 too.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
---
arch/arm/xen/Makefile |2 +-
arch/arm/xen/mm.c
xen_dma_unmap_page and xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu take a dma_addr_t
handle as argument, not a physical address.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
On x86 truncation cannot occur because config XEN depends on X86_64 ||
(X86_32 X86_PAE).
On ARM truncation can occur without CONFIG_ARM_LPAE, when the dma
operation involves foreign grants. However in that case the physical
address returned by xen_bus_to_phys is actually invalid (there is no mfn
Introduce support for new hypercall GNTTABOP_cache_flush.
Use it to perform cache flashing on pages used for dma when necessary.
If GNTTABOP_cache_flush is supported by the hypervisor, we don't need to
bounce dma map operations that involve foreign grants and non-coherent
devices.
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 00:56 -0800, Steve Freitas wrote:
configure: error: Unable to find Python development headers
configure: error: ./configure failed for tools
config.log/status (perhaps the ones under tools/) might give a clue as
to why it thinks it can't find them.
Ian.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:03:22PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 11/11/14 17:36, Wei Liu wrote:
# What's already implemented?
PV vNUMA support in libxl/xl and Linux kernel.
Linux doesn't have vnuma yet, although the last set of patches I saw
looked fine and were waiting for acks from
On 11/11/2014 08:28 PM, M A Young wrote:
The build of xen-4.5.0-rc2 fails if XSM_ENABLE=y due to an inconsistency
in commit fda1614 xen/arm: Add support for GICv3 for domU which uses
XEN_DOMCTL_configure_domain in xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c and
xen/xsm/flask/policy/access_vectors but
On 11/12/2014 01:58 AM, Hu, Robert wrote:
2. Failed to hotplug a VT-d device with XEN4.5-RC1
http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1894
This should be addressed by these two:
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-11/msg00875.html
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:53 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
I think it shall be stored somewhere and be tracked, rather than one
by one mail thread. To follow your suggestion, I would next time in
addition send each bug per mail, with descriptions contained.
If you send each bug as a separate email
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:01AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.11.14 at 19:03, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 11/11/14 17:36, Wei Liu wrote:
Option #1 requires less modification to guest, because guest won't
need to switch to new hypercall. It's unclear at this point if a guest
flight 31497 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31497/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 30603
On 12.11.14 at 14:45, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:01AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.11.14 at 19:03, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 11/11/14 17:36, Wei Liu wrote:
Option #1 requires less modification to guest, because guest won't
need to switch to new
Hi,
On 11/12/2014 11:39 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
this patch series introduces support for GNTTABOP_cache_flush to perform
cache maintenance operation on foreign pages and reverts the current
code based on XENFEAT_grant_map_identity.
It also provides a very slow fallback by
On 11/12/2014 10:07 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 17:50 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
Somehow I missed this email.
On 30/10/2014 13:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
create !
title it arm: domain 0 disables clocks which are in fact being used
thanks
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 16:39
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:13:09PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 14:45, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:01AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.11.14 at 19:03, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 11/11/14 17:36, Wei Liu wrote:
Option #1 requires less
On 12/11/14 14:27, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:13:09PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 14:45, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:01AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.11.14 at 19:03, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 11/11/14 17:36, Wei Liu wrote:
On 11/12/2014 06:31 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:42:04AM -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:41:32AM -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 11/11/2014 06:01 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:54:18PM -0500, Zhigang
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:36 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
Also I want clarify one thing: the @introduceDomain watch is triggered at the
same
time for xm/xend and xl: when VM fully migrated.
The different between xm/xend and xl is: xend will populate destination side
VM
xenstore entries at
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:29:56PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 12/11/14 14:27, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:13:09PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 14:45, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:01AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.11.14 at 19:03,
On 11/12/2014 09:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:36 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
Also I want clarify one thing: the @introduceDomain watch is triggered at
the same
time for xm/xend and xl: when VM fully migrated.
The different between xm/xend and xl is: xend will populate
On 12.11.14 at 15:40, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
So what's the usual technique in Linux to make sure if a specific
Xen feature is present?
Jan, is it suitable to use a XENFEAT_* bit for this?
Yes, that would be the canonical way.
Jan
___
On 11/12/2014 09:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:48 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 11/12/2014 09:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:36 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
Also I want clarify one thing: the @introduceDomain watch is triggered at
the same
time for
Signed-off-by: Clark Laughlin clark.laugh...@linaro.org
---
tools/misc/mkdeb | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/misc/mkdeb b/tools/misc/mkdeb
index 3bbf881..4d14d9e 100644
--- a/tools/misc/mkdeb
+++ b/tools/misc/mkdeb
@@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ fi
ia64 provides a duplicate of the generic dma_get_required_mask()
because it has ARCH_HAS_GET_REQUIRED_MASK. Provide a common
dma_get_require_mask_max_pfn() instead.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Cc: Tony Luck tony.l...@intel.com
Cc: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
Cc:
On a Xen PV guest the DMA addresses and physical addresses are not 1:1
(such as Xen PV guests) and the generic dma_get_required_mask() does
not return the correct mask (since it uses max_pfn).
Some device drivers (such as mptsas, mpt2sas) use
dma_get_required_mask() to set the device's DMA mask
Use dma_ops-get_required_mask() if provided, defaulting to
dma_get_requried_mask_from_max_pfn().
This is needed on systems (such as Xen PV guests) where the DMA
address and the physical address are not equal.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/device.h
On systems where DMA addresses and physical addresses are not 1:1
(such as Xen PV guests), the generic dma_get_required_mask() will not
return the correct mask (since it uses max_pfn).
Some device drivers (such as mptsas, mpt2sas) use
dma_get_required_mask() to set the device's DMA mask to allow
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:27 -0600, Clark Laughlin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Clark Laughlin clark.laugh...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
The mapping is a bit more zealous that strictly needed:
+# map the architecture, if necessary
+arch=$XEN_TARGET_ARCH
+case
The spin-lock implementation in the xen-access test program is implemented
in a fashion that is actually incomplete. The x86 assembly that guarantees that
the lock is held by only one thread lacks the lock; instruction.
However, the spin-lock is not actually necessary in xen-access as it is not
The name of the ring still implies it is used only for memory accesses,
which is no longer the case. It is also used to deliver variuos HVM events,
thus the name monitor is more appropriate in this setting.
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel tamas.leng...@zentific.com
---
This patch series aims to clean up the mem_event subsystem within Xen. The
original use-case for this system was to allow external helper applications
running in privileged domains to control various memory operations performed
by Xen. Amongs these were paging, sharing and access control. The
The vm_event subsystem has been artifically tied to the presence of mem_access.
While mem_access does depend on vm_event, vm_event is an entirely independent
subsystem that can be used for arbitrary function-offloading to helper apps in
domains. This patch removes the dependency that mem_access
The function names currently imply that these events are to be delivered via
the memory_event subsystem. However, the naming is confusing as these events
have nothing to do with actual memory events. Simply naming these functions
hvm_event_* more accurately describe their usage.
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:38 -0600, Clark Laughlin wrote:
mkdeb previously set the package architecture to be 'amd64' for anything
other than
XEN_TARGET_ARCH=x86_32. This patch attempts to correctly map the
architecture from
GNU names to debian names for x86 and ARM architectures, or
This patch fixes two issues with persistent grants and the disk PV backend
(Qdisk):
- Don't use batch mappings when using persistent grants, doing so prevents
unmapping single grants (the whole area has to be unmapped at once).
- Unmap persistent grants before switching to the closed state,
On 12.11.14 at 16:25, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
+u64
+xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
+{
+ u64 max_mfn;
+
+ max_mfn = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_maximum_ram_page, NULL);
+
+ return DMA_BIT_MASK(fls64(max_mfn PAGE_SHIFT) + 1);
+}
The value the
On 12/11/14 15:31, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/public/mem_event.h b/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
index 599f9e8..c0e9394 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
@@ -49,15 +49,19 @@
#define MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE_NOWRITE (1 6)
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:12:06AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
You forgot to add the release manager... I've done that for you.
In 1413279117.1497.25.ca...@citrix.com I said:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Is this a bug fix or a feature? What are the risks? IsLKonrad OK
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:56:24AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:39 +, Wei Liu wrote:
... otherwise when device add operation fails, the error message looks
like libxl: error: libxl.c:1897:device_addrm_aocomplete: unable to (null)
device, which is not very helpful.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:11:15AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Juergen Gross jgr...@suse.com wrote:
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:10:02PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Commit bac6334b51d9bcfe57ecf4a4cb5288348fcf044a (move domain to
cpupool0 before destroying it) introduced an error in the accounting
of cpupools regarding the number of domains. The number of domains
is nor adjusted when a domain
On 12/11/14 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.14 at 16:25, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
+u64
+xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
+{
+u64 max_mfn;
+
+max_mfn = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_maximum_ram_page, NULL);
+
+return DMA_BIT_MASK(fls64(max_mfn
Basic root-causing log:
--
[root@vt-hsw1 carl]# xl cr xlexample.hvm
Parsing config from xlexample.hvm
libxl: error: libxl_qmp.c:287:qmp_handle_error_response: received an error
message from QMP server: Unsupported bus. Bus doesn't have property
'acpi-pcihp-bsel' set
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:23:58AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:14:48PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:03:22PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 11/11/14 17:36, Wei Liu wrote:
# What's already implemented?
PV vNUMA support in
This small series change the behavior of libxl_retrieve_domain_configuration,
to make it continue to retrieve information from xenstore even if JSON template
is not available.
This change of API behaviour is only internal. Conceptually speaking, any
non-zero return value means d_config is
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:06:57PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
What happens if we do not take that in now but delay to Xen 4.6?
I will be very unhappy...
I mean, what exactly is the concern here?!
I need to know what the risk is if this does
Unconditionally print out the partial configuration.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
Cc: Zhigang Wang zhigang.x.w...@oracle.com
Cc: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
---
tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 2
Continue when libxl_retrieve_domain_configuration encounters
ERROR_JSON_CONFIG_EMPTY, as caller might be interested in the partial
configuration pulled from xenstore. In this case
ERROR_JSON_CONFIG_EMPTY is used as return value as before, if no other
error happens along the way.
Signed-off-by:
Return proper error codes on failure so that scripts can tell whether
the command completed properly or not.
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap george.dun...@eu.citrix.com
---
CC: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
CC: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@citrix.com
CC: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
CC: Konrad Wilk
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:31:33PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
Return proper error codes on failure so that scripts can tell whether
the command completed properly or not.
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap george.dun...@eu.citrix.com
---
CC: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
CC: Ian Jackson
flight 31505 linux-3.10 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31505/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26303
Regressions which are
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 11/12/2014 12:04 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
This small series change the behavior of
libxl_retrieve_domain_configuration,
to make it continue to retrieve information from xenstore even if JSON
template
is not available.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:43:40AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Early in the boot process the memory layout of a pv-domain is changed
to match the E820 map (either the host one for Dom0 or the Xen one)
regarding placement of RAM and PCI holes. This requires removing memory
pages initially
flight 31509 rumpuserxen real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31509/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 11 rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels
fail REGR. vs. 31437
@@ -376,12 +374,14 @@ void __init xen_build_dynamic_phys_to_machine(void)
unsigned long max_pfn;
unsigned long pfn;
- if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
+ if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
Spurious change.
.. snip..
diff --git
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:43:44AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Today get_phys_to_machine() is always called when the mfn for a pfn
is to be obtained. Add a wrapper __pfn_to_mfn() as inline function
to be able to avoid calling get_phys_to_machine() when possible as
s/when/where/
soon as the
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:06:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:58:49AM +, Hu, Robert wrote:
Hi All,
This is a bug summary for Xen 4.5-rc1 on Intel Server platforms.
Yeey! Thank you for doing those tests.
Test environment:
Xen: Xen 4.5-rc1
Hello,
I am trying to set up a shared page between the hypervisor and a Linux guest
kernel. In Xen I am doing:
void *ptr = alloc_xenheap_page();
share_xen_page_with_guest(virt_to_page(ptr), current-domain,
XENSHARE_writable);
unsigned int mfn = virt_to_mfn(ptr);
And my plan was to pass the
On November 12, 2014 8:01:21 PM EST, Chao Peng chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:22:07AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:10:52AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
CCing the folks who signed-of-by is on the original patch
On Wed,
-Original Message-
From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:07 PM
To: Hu, Robert
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; jbeul...@suse.com; wei.l...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at
flight 31504 linux-3.14 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31504/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 30755
build-i386
flight 31508 libvirt real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31508/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 9
Hi,
This is a separated bug report for
http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1896.
Environment:
Service Arch (ia32/ia32e/IA64): ia32e
Guest Arch (ia32/ia32e/IA64): ia32e
Guest OS Type (Linux/Windows): Windows8.1, Windows2012
Change Set: Xen4.5-RC1
-Original Message-
From: Fabio Fantoni [mailto:fabio.fant...@m2r.biz]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:59 PM
To: Hu, Robert; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: jbeul...@suse.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1
Il 12/11/2014 07:58, Hu, Robert ha
flight 31507 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31507/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 8 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 31241
On 11/12/2014 10:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:43:40AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
index a8a1a3d..d3e492b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
@@ -1223,6 +1223,10 @@ static void __init
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
