On Tue, Nov 25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
The purpose of this email is to plan how to progress the migrationv2
series through to being merged. I believe I have CC'd everyone with a
specific interest in this area, but apologies if I have missed anyone.
While you mow that lawn, did you guys think
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 09:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've not seen an individual thread on this one, so replying here.
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:59 +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
6. Networking is unavailable after saverestore Windows guest
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 17:05 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 16:49 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:43 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Account for the
On 11/26/2014 07:21 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
And leave it running for a while, and see if the trace is always the
same, or if there are variations on it...
Amusing.
Lookie here:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 15:23 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
We have a regression due to (5195c14c8: netfilter: conntrack: fix race
in __nf_conntrack_confirm against get_next_corpse). I have not been able
to reproduce this on baremetal but dom0 crashes reliably after a few
seconds of idle
flight 31855 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31855/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-pair17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail like 31801
Tests which did not
On 26/11/14 07:21, hanyandong wrote:
hi all,
I found xentrace will lost record if there are too many event to trace.
But every event is important to me, so I want to trace all of them,
not lost one.
what could I do to achieve this goal ?
If it need to modify the source code of xentrace, I
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Jason Wang wrote:
On 11/25/2014 09:53 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Jason Wang wrote:
On 11/25/2014 02:44 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
CC'ing Paolo.
flight 31856 linux-3.10 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31856/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26303
Tests which are
Olaf Hering writes ([PATCH v2] xen: use more fixed strings to build the
hypervisor):
It should be possible to repeatedly build identical sources and get
identical binaries, even on different hosts at different build times.
This fails for xen.gz and xen.efi because current time and buildhost
No, this happens before guests are started.
On November 26, 2014 4:45:22 AM EST, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 15:23 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
We have a regression due to (5195c14c8: netfilter: conntrack: fix
race
in __nf_conntrack_confirm against
Hi,
I tried to enable kdump on my test-machine with actual xen-unstable
booting via EFI.
The kdump kernel is not being loaded.
I'm seeing the memory being reserved:
(XEN) EFI RAM map:
(XEN) - 000a (usable)
(XEN) 0010 - 4bc0 (usable)
(XEN)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 17:05 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 16:49 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:43 +,
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 11:15 +, Wei Liu wrote:
This will result in assertion in libxl_set_vcpuaffinity()-libxl_bitmap_copy()
since the destination bitmap is created for maximum number of CPUs.
FYI I'm also seeing this with libvirt (on ARM, but I don't think that
matters) when the guest XML
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 12:39 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 17:05 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 16:49 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov
On 11/26/2014 01:41 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 26/11/14 12:15, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hi,
I tried to enable kdump on my test-machine with actual xen-unstable
booting via EFI.
The kdump kernel is not being loaded.
I'm seeing the memory being reserved:
(XEN) EFI RAM map:
(XEN)
On 11/25/2014 08:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+static long vpmu_sched_checkin(void *arg)
+{
+int cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
unsigned int.
+int ret;
+
+/* Mode change shouldn't take more than a few (say, 5) seconds. */
+if ( NOW()
On 26/11/14 14:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 11/26/2014 01:41 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 26/11/14 12:15, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hi,
I tried to enable kdump on my test-machine with actual xen-unstable
booting via EFI.
The kdump kernel is not being loaded.
I'm seeing the memory being
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:01:51PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 11/26/2014 01:41 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 26/11/14 12:15, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hi,
I tried to enable kdump on my test-machine with actual xen-unstable
booting via EFI.
The kdump kernel is not being loaded.
I'm seeing
On 11/25/2014 08:49 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.11.14 at 00:07, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
@@ -244,19 +256,19 @@ void vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
switch ( vendor )
{
case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
-if ( svm_vpmu_initialise(v, opt_vpmu_enabled) != 0 )
-
On 11/25/2014 09:28 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+else
+{
+struct segment_register seg;
+
+hvm_get_segment_register(sampled, x86_seg_cs, seg);
+r-cs = seg.sel;
+hvm_get_segment_register(sampled, x86_seg_ss,
On Wed, Nov 26, Andrew Cooper wrote:
It is certainly my hope going forward that different knobs can be
exposed. One thing I think would be interesting is some proper
calculations of the delta in the dirty set, and offering a threshold
which chooses between pause and complete or abort the
This makes fields 0 and 1 true more often than they should be, resulting
problems when handling events.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com
CC: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
CC: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
CC: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
CC: Dave Scott
Hi,
I'm seeing quite a few of these when shutting down domains:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb47f9420 (LWP 3322)]
0xb16d2f20 in osevent_release_nexus (gc=0xb47f88bc,
nexi_idle=0x2a0968fc, nexus=0x0) at libxl_event.c:119
On 26/11/2014 15:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This makes fields 0 and 1 true more often than they should be, resulting
problems when handling events.
Indeed, looks like a mistake I made when rewriting the logic terms lately. The
result is POLLUP or POLLERR events being returned in more categories
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 13:20 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:18:52PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 12:40 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
The rest of the Xen
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
There is an xl/libxl part of the migration v2 series which attempts to
rectify this all in one go, as there is no alternative way of doing so.
The libxl section of the series is certainly not yet complete, but
specific queries to the
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
3) Libxl and xl support
Libxl and xl have as many problems as the libxc code did when it comes
to incompatible wire formats and layering violations. In particular, it
is not possible to determine the bitness of the sending
On Nov 26, 2014 11:39 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 13:20 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:18:52PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On
From: Seth Forshee seth.fors...@canonical.com
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:28:24 -0600
These BUGs can be erroneously triggered by frags which refer to
tail pages within a compound page. The data in these pages may
overrun the hardware page while still being contained within the
compound page,
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] segv in osevent_release_nexus with libxl
backend to libvirt):
I don't know if this helps but on the 3 occasions I've just looked at
the ev passed to libxl__ev_fd_deregister contains an fd which
corresponds to a still open handle on /dev/xen/evtchn.
I see
On 26/11/14 16:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
3) Libxl and xl support
Libxl and xl have as many problems as the libxc code did when it comes
to incompatible wire formats and layering violations. In particular, it
is not possible to determine
On 26/11/14 16:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com 11/25/14 7:14 PM
On 25/11/14 17:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.11.14 at 17:54, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
This is RFC as there is still a niggle. I tested this via a partial
revert of
the XSA-110 fix but the
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:32:21PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 26/11/14 a les 17.55, Wei Liu ha escrit:
Modify libxl and hotplug script to allow raw format file to use phy
backend.
The block script now tests the path and determine the actual type of
file (block device or regular
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 25/11/14 17:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Increase maxmem before calling xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact to avoid
the risk of running out of guest memory. This way we can also avoid
complex memory calculations in libxl at domain construction
On 26 Nov 2014, at 15:38, Zheng Li d...@zheng.li wrote:
On 26/11/2014 15:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This makes fields 0 and 1 true more often than they should be, resulting
problems when handling events.
Indeed, looks like a mistake I made when rewriting the logic terms lately.
The
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:24:11PM +, Dave Scott wrote:
On 26 Nov 2014, at 15:38, Zheng Li d...@zheng.li wrote:
On 26/11/2014 15:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This makes fields 0 and 1 true more often than they should be, resulting
problems when handling events.
Indeed, looks like
Hi,
While testing a patch for Konrad i was wondering why libxl_pci.c:
libxl__device_pci_reset()
doesn't get called on guest shutdown of a HVM guest (qemu-xen) with pci
passthrough.
xl didn't show any problems on the commandline so i never drawed much attention
to it, but
On 26/11/2014 19:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Strictly speaking Zheng, not being a maintainer, can't ack the patch,
given what I believe to be Xens current rules for these things.
However, as the author of the code and comment in this thread, his ack
can reasonably be considered equivalent to a
On 26 Nov 2014, at 18:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:24:11PM +, Dave Scott wrote:
On 26 Nov 2014, at 15:38, Zheng Li d...@zheng.li wrote:
On 26/11/2014 15:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This makes fields 0 and 1 true more often than
On 26/11/2014 19:54, M A Young wrote:
If differences are found during the verification phase of xl migrate
--debug then it is likely to crash with a segfault because the bogus
pagebuf-pfn_types[pfn] is used in a print statement instead of
pfn_type[pfn] .
Signed-off-by: Michael Young
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
Some folks had reported that some xen hypercalls take a long time
to complete when issued from the userspace private ioctl mechanism,
this can happen for instance with some hypercalls that have many
sub-operations, this can happen for instance on hypercalls
On 11/26/14 13:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 25/11/14 17:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Increase maxmem before calling xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact to avoid
the risk of running out of guest memory. This way we can also avoid
complex memory
On 11/25/2014 03:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Okay, so it's not really the mwait-idle driver causing the regression,
but it is C-state related. Hence we're now down to seeing whether all
or just the deeper C states are affected, i.e. I now need to ask you
to play with max_cstate=. For that you'll
On 11/27/2014 01:19 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:49:54PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 11/26/2014 03:30 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:01:51PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 11/26/2014 01:41 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 26/11/14 12:15,
45 matches
Mail list logo
