Re: [Xen-devel] x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On 21 September 2017 at 08:59, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > ( Sorry about the delay in answering this. I could blame the delay on the > > merge > > window, but in reality I've been

Re: [Xen-devel] Booting signed xen.efi through shim

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 08/13] xen/pvcalls: implement accept command

+int pvcalls_front_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags) +{ + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata; + struct sock_mapping *map; + struct sock_mapping *map2 = NULL; + struct xen_pvcalls_request *req; + int notify, req_id, ret, evtchn, nonblock; +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: use vMSI related #define-s from public interface

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 21.09.17 at 03:12, wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c > >> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c > >> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ > >> > >> #define XEN_PT_AUTO_ASSIGN -1 > >> > >> +#ifndef

Re: [Xen-devel] pci-passthrough loses msi-x interrupts ability after domain destroy

Thursday, September 21, 2017, 10:39:52 AM, you wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 03:50:35PM -0400, Jérôme Oufella wrote: >> Hi Xen-devel, >> >> I'm using PCI pass-through to map a PCIe (intel i210) controller into >> a HVM domain. The system uses xen-pciback to hide the appropriate PCI >>

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 113656: regressions - FAIL

flight 113656 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113656/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 18 guest-start/win.repeat fail REGR. vs. 113387

Re: [Xen-devel] x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > ( Sorry about the delay in answering this. I could blame the delay on the > merge > window, but in reality I've been procrastinating this is due to the > permanent, > non-trivial impact PIE has on generated C code. )

Re: [Xen-devel] [stage1-xen PATCH v2 04/11] build/fedora: Add `run` and `components/*` scripts

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Rajiv Ranganath wrote: > From: Rajiv M Ranganath > > In order to build stage1-xen we require three components - > > 1. Xen > 2. Qemu > 3. Rkt > > These components are built using scripts in `build/fedora/components/` > directory. These scripts

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 113659: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 113659 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113659/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 113626 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14

Re: [Xen-devel] x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > ( Sorry about the delay in answering this. I could blame the delay on the > > merge > > window, but in reality I've been

Re: [Xen-devel] [stage1-xen PATCH v2 09/11] build/fedora: Add `RUNNING_STAGE1_XEN.md`

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Rajiv Ranganath wrote: > We are installing xen in `/opt/` directory. By keeping builds isolated in > `/opt/` we can test multiple versions of xen during development. In > production a simliar approach can be used to support multiple versions of > xen along with a higher level

Re: [Xen-devel] [stage1-xen PATCH v2 05/11] build/fedora: Add `source_path.sh`

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Rajiv Ranganath wrote: > From: Rajiv M Ranganath > > Signed-off-by: Rajiv Ranganath Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini > --- > build/fedora/source_path.sh |3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3

Re: [Xen-devel] [stage1-xen PATCH v2 07/11] .circleci/config.yml: Add

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Rajiv Ranganath wrote: > From: Rajiv M Ranganath > > Signed-off-by: Rajiv Ranganath Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini > --- > .circleci/config.yml | 21 + > 1 file

Re: [Xen-devel] [stage1-xen PATCH v2 11/11] README.md: Mention preview status

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Rajiv Ranganath wrote: > From: Rajiv M Ranganath > > Signed-off-by: Rajiv Ranganath Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini > --- > README.md |1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 113684: regressions - FAIL

flight 113684 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113684/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 113647 build-i386-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] Booting signed xen.efi through shim

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 113668: regressions - FAIL

flight 113668 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113668/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 18 guest-start/win.repeat fail REGR. vs. 113359

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: commit 0ade5e causes psr features in cmdline cannot be correctly enumerated

Commit 0ade5e causes a bug that the psr features presented in cmdline cannot be correctly enumerated. 1. If there is only 'psr=', then CMT is enumerated which is not right. 2. If cmdline is 'psr=cmt,cat,cdp,mba', only the last feature is enumerated. This patch fixes the issues. Signed-off-by: Yi

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 113680: regressions - FAIL

flight 113680 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113680/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt broken in 113640 build-armhf-pvops

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/21] libxl: introduce a way to mark fields as deprecated in the idl

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH v2 02/21] libxl: introduce a way to mark fields as deprecated in the idl"): > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:46:16PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: ... > > We discussed how this might be done better. To me it seems like the > > only really plausible alternative was to replace

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] Introduce migration precopy policy

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:18:16PM +0100, Jennifer Herbert wrote: > > On 20/09/17 11:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Jennifer Herbert wrote: > > > > +? XGS_POLICY_STOP_AND_COPY > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 03/11] livepatch: Include sizes when an mismatch occurs

>>> On 21.09.17 at 00:31, wrote: > If the .bug.frames.X or .livepatch.funcs sizes are different > than what the hypervisor expects - we fail the payload. To help > in diagnosing this include the expected and the payload > sizes. > > Also make it more natural by having

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 10/11] livepatch/arm[32, 64]: Modify .livepatch.funcs section to be RW when patching

>>> On 21.09.17 at 00:31, wrote: > @@ -43,7 +46,29 @@ int arch_livepatch_quiesce(void) > return -ENOMEM; > } > > -return 0; > +if ( nfuncs ) > +{ > +unsigned long va = (unsigned long)func; > +unsigned int offs = va & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 1/4] x86emul: New return code for unimplemented instruction

>>> On 21.09.17 at 07:12, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > @@ -6195,7 +6196,7 @@ x86_emulate( > /* vpsll{w,d} $imm8,{x,y}mm,{x,y}mm */ > break; > default: > -

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] common/efi: bail if dom0 fails the shim verification step

>>> On 20.09.17 at 22:57, wrote: > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c > @@ -1226,9 +1226,13 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE > *SystemTable) > efi_bs->FreePool(name.w); > > if (

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: ITS: Deny hardware domain access to ITS

From: Manish Jaggi This patch extends the gicv3_iomem_deny_access functionality by adding support for ITS region as well. Add function gicv3_its_deny_access. Signed-off-by: Manish Jaggi --- xen/arch/arm/gic-v3-its.c| 22 ++

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: ITS: Introduce common function add_to_host_its_list

From: Manish Jaggi add_to_host_its_list will update the host_its_list. This common function to be invoked from gicv3_its_dt_init and gic_v3_its_acpi_probe. Signed-off-by: Manish Jaggi Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara Acked-by: Julien

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 05/11] alternative/x86/arm32: Align altinstructions (and altinstr_replacement) sections.

>>> On 21.09.17 at 00:31, wrote: > @@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ int apply_alternatives(const struct alt_instr *start, const > struct alt_instr *en > #include > > .macro altinstruction_entry orig_offset alt_offset feature orig_len alt_len > + .p2align 2 > .word \orig_offset

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] x86: fix bug caused by commit 0ade5e

>>> On 21.09.17 at 10:11, wrote: A better title for the patch is needed. > Commit 0ade5e causes a bug that only the psr features presented in cmdline > cannot be correctly enumerated. To me it looks like either the "only" is wrong here, or the "cannot" was meant to be

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] xen/x86: mem_access: Fix mis-indented line

On 09/21/2017 03:40 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > > --- > > Cc: Razvan Cojocaru > Cc: Tamas K Lengyel > Cc: George Dunlap > Cc: Jan Beulich > Cc:

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 113658: regressions - FAIL

flight 113658 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113658/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 113647 build-i386-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/perfc: Fix build after commit fc32575968 when CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=y

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:35:17PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > The commit fc32575968 "public/sysctl: drop unnecessary typedefs and > handles" went a bit too far by replacing all xen_systcl_*_t type to > struct xen_sysctl_*. > > However, xen_sysctl_perfc_val_t was a typedef on uint32_t and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 13/15] xen: make grant resource limits per domain

On 21/09/17 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.09.17 at 09:53, wrote: >> On 21/09/17 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 21.09.17 at 06:35, wrote: On 20/09/17 17:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 20.09.17 at 14:44, wrote: >> On

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 13/15] xen: make grant resource limits per domain

On 21/09/17 13:48, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.09.17 at 13:39, wrote: >> On 21/09/17 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 21.09.17 at 09:53, wrote: On 21/09/17 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.09.17 at 06:35, wrote: >> On

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 07/11] xen: introduce rangeset_consume_ranges

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:29:32PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > This function allows to iterate over a rangeset while removing the > processed regions. > > It will be used by the following patches in order to store memory > regions in rangesets, and remove them while iterating. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: Remove unnecessary is_hvm_domain() test in construct_vmcs()

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 03:50:27PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > It's a leftover from PVHv1 days. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, Roger. ___ Xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 6/6] acpi:arm64: Add support for parsing IORT table

Hi Sameer, On 21/09/17 01:37, Goel, Sameer wrote: [...] diff --git a/xen/include/xen/lib.h b/xen/include/xen/lib.h index 995a85a..3785fae 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/lib.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/lib.h @@ -9,7 +9,12 @@ #include #define BUG_ON(p) do { if (unlikely(p)) BUG(); } while

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V3 1/3] Xen: Increase hap/shadow page pool size to support more vcpus support

>>> On 21.09.17 at 10:50, wrote: > On 2017年09月20日 23:13, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:06:26AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: >>> Hi Wei: >>> >>> On 2017年09月18日 21:06, Wei Liu wrote: On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:52:47AM -0400, Lan Tianyu wrote: > This patch

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 113661: regressions - FAIL

flight 113661 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113661/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 113647 build-i386-xsm

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 113650: regressions - FAIL

flight 113650 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113650/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-examine 5 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 113629

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Fix coding style

Also take the opportunity to: - move from 1 << * to 1UL << *. - use unsigned when possible - move from unsigned int -> unsigned long for some induction variables Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Fix coding style for comments

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper Changes in v2: - Add Andrew's acked-by ---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 4/4] x86emul: Raise #UD when emulating an unrecognized instruction.

>>> On 21.09.17 at 10:57, wrote: >> From: Petre Pircalabu [mailto:ppircal...@bitdefender.com] >> Sent: 21 September 2017 06:12 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/realmode.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/realmode.c >> @@ -106,12 +106,21 @@ void vmx_realmode_emulate_one(struct

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 113662: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 113662 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113662/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/perfc: Fix build after commit fc32575968 when CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=y

>>> On 21.09.17 at 13:35, wrote: > The commit fc32575968 "public/sysctl: drop unnecessary typedefs and > handles" went a bit too far by replacing all xen_systcl_*_t type to > struct xen_sysctl_*. > > However, xen_sysctl_perfc_val_t was a typedef on uint32_t and therefore >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] xen/x86: mem_access: Fix mis-indented line

>>> On 21.09.17 at 14:40, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c > @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ int p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access(struct domain *d, struct > p2m_domain *hp2m, > } > > return ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn, mfn,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 02/11] vpci: introduce basic handlers to trap accesses to the PCI config space

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:29:27PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > This functionality is going to reside in vpci.c (and the corresponding > vpci.h header), and should be arch-agnostic. The handlers introduced > in this patch setup the basic functionality required in order to trap > accesses to the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: support 52 bit physical addresses in pv guests

On 09/21/2017 04:01 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: Physical addresses on processors supporting 5 level paging can be up to 52 bits wide. For a Xen pv guest running on such a machine those physical addresses have to be supported in order to be able to use any memory on the machine even if the guest

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] arm: smccc: handle SMCs according to SMCCC

On 20/09/17 21:26, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: On 20.09.17 23:02, Julien Grall wrote: On 20/09/2017 19:11, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: On 20.09.17 20:21, Julien Grall wrote: On 19/09/17 22:44, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: Hi Julien, Hi Volodymyr, On 13.09.17 14:11, Julien Grall wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Avoid redundant assignments in p2m_pod_demand_populate

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:24PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > gfn_aligned is assigned 3 times with the exact same formula. All the > variables used are not modified, so consolidate in a single assignment > at the beginning of the function. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] common/efi: bail if dom0 fails the shim verification step

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 20.09.17 at 22:57, wrote: >> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c >> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c >> @@ -1226,9 +1226,13 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE >> *SystemTable) >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 10/11] livepatch/arm[32, 64]: Modify .livepatch.funcs section to be RW when patching

>>> On 21.09.17 at 16:58, wrote: > Do you foresee potentially issue of temporarily modifying permissions of > a mapping? It's generally not a good idea imo, but perhaps it's fine here. I assume the page permissions can't be adversely affected despite their hard coding in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 14/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Use typesafe gfn for the fields reclaim_single and max_guest

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:33PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: support 52 bit physical addresses in pv guests

On 09/21/2017 10:41 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: On 21/09/17 16:14, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 09/21/2017 04:01 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: Physical addresses on processors supporting 5 level paging can be up to 52 bits wide. For a Xen pv guest running on such a machine those physical addresses

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: support 52 bit physical addresses in pv guests

On 21/09/17 16:14, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 09/21/2017 04:01 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Physical addresses on processors supporting 5 level paging can be up to >> 52 bits wide. For a Xen pv guest running on such a machine those >> physical addresses have to be supported in order to be

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 07/11] xen: introduce rangeset_consume_ranges

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 02:53:54PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:29:32PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > This function allows to iterate over a rangeset while removing the > > processed regions. > > > > It will be used by the following patches in order to store memory > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 10/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Use typesafe GFN in pod_eager_record

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:29PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 11/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Clean-up p2m_pod_zero_check

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:30PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/16] xen/x86: p2m: Use typesafe GFN in p2m_set_entry

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper > Acked-by: Tamas K Lengyel > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/24] xen/arm: page: Use ARMv8 naming to improve readability

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 20/09/17 00:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > > > index 30fcfa0778..899fd1801a 100644 > > > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > > >

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 113669: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 113669 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113669/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl

[Xen-devel] [ovmf bisection] complete build-amd64-xsm

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-amd64-xsm testid xen-build Tree: ovmf https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git *** Found and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Clean-up includes

On 09/21/2017 01:40 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > A lot of the headers are not necessary. At the same time, order them in the > alphabetical order. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Acked-by: George Dunlap

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] Introduce migration precopy policy

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:13:55PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:18:16PM +0100, Jennifer Herbert wrote: > > > On 20/09/17 11:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:06:26PM +0100,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Fix coding style

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:23PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Also take the opportunity to: > - move from 1 << * to 1UL << *. > - use unsigned when possible > - move from unsigned int -> unsigned long for some induction > variables > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 13/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Use typesafe gfn in p2m_pod_demand_populate

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:32PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 15/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Rework prototype of p2m_pod_demand_populate

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > - Switch the return type to bool > - Remove the parameter p2m_query_t q as it is not used > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 12/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Use typesafe gfn in p2m_pod_zero_check

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:31PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > At the same time make the array gfns const has it is not modified within > the function. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

On 21 September 2017 at 08:59, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > ( Sorry about the delay in answering this. I could blame the delay on the > merge > window, but in reality I've been procrastinating this is due to the > permanent, > non-trivial impact PIE has on generated C code. ) >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Clean-up includes

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > A lot of the headers are not necessary. At the same time, order them in the > alphabetical order. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Remove trailing whitespaces

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:21PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Fix coding style for comments

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:22PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/24] xen/arm: page: Use ARMv8 naming to improve readability

Hi, On 20/09/17 00:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote: diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h index 30fcfa0778..899fd1801a 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h @@ -26,14 +26,14 @@ * LPAE entry; the 8-bit fields are packed

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Use typesafe gfn in p2m_pod_decrease_reservation

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:26PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper I wonder how gfn_lock work with the new time without any change, but it appears gfn_lock ignores gfn completely. :-)

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/16] xen/x86: p2m: Use typesafe gfn for the P2M callbacks get_entry and set_entry

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:27PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 06/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Clean-up use of typesafe MFN

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:40:25PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Some unboxing/boxing can be avoided by using mfn_add(...) instead. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 10/11] livepatch/arm[32, 64]: Modify .livepatch.funcs section to be RW when patching

Hi Jan, On 21/09/17 13:16, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.09.17 at 00:31, wrote: @@ -43,7 +46,29 @@ int arch_livepatch_quiesce(void) return -ENOMEM; } -return 0; +if ( nfuncs ) +{ +unsigned long va = (unsigned long)func; +unsigned

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/24] xen/arm: page: Use ARMv8 naming to improve readability

Hi, On 21/09/17 16:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 20/09/17 00:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote: diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h index 30fcfa0778..899fd1801a 100644 ---

Re: [Xen-devel] x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

( Sorry about the delay in answering this. I could blame the delay on the merge window, but in reality I've been procrastinating this is due to the permanent, non-trivial impact PIE has on generated C code. ) * Thomas Garnier wrote: > 1) PIE sometime needs two

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 113655: regressions - FAIL

flight 113655 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113655/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt broken in 113640 build-armhf-pvops

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: support 52 bit physical addresses in pv guests

On 21/09/17 17:00, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross ---    arch/x86/include/asm/xen/page.h | 11 ++-    arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c   |  4 ++--    2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/page.h

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/22] xentoolcore_restrict_all: Implement for libxenforeignmemory

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 10/22] xentoolcore_restrict_all: Implement for libxenforeignmemory"): > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 10/22] xentoolcore_restrict_all: Implement for > > libxenforeignmemory"): > > > Sure that's fine. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Remove trailing whitespaces

On 09/21/2017 01:40 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: George Dunlap > > --- > > Cc: George Dunlap > Cc: Jan Beulich

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] Introduce migration precopy policy

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:18:16PM +0100, Jennifer Herbert wrote: > On 20/09/17 11:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Jennifer Herbert wrote: > > > +? XGS_POLICY_STOP_AND_COPY > > > +: XGS_POLICY_CONTINUE_PRECOPY; > > > +} > > > + > > > +/* > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 13/15] xen: make grant resource limits per domain

>>> On 21.09.17 at 13:39, wrote: > On 21/09/17 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 21.09.17 at 09:53, wrote: >>> On 21/09/17 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 21.09.17 at 06:35, wrote: > On 20/09/17 17:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 11/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Clean-up p2m_pod_zero_check

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper Changes in v2: - Add Andrew's acked-by ---

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/16] xen/x86: p2m: Use typesafe GFN in p2m_set_entry

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper Acked-by: Tamas K Lengyel --- Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: Tamas K

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 15/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Rework prototype of p2m_pod_demand_populate

- Switch the return type to bool - Remove the parameter p2m_query_t q as it is not used Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Jan Beulich Cc:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Clean-up includes

A lot of the headers are not necessary. At the same time, order them in the alphabetical order. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Jan Beulich Cc:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Avoid redundant assignments in p2m_pod_demand_populate

gfn_aligned is assigned 3 times with the exact same formula. All the variables used are not modified, so consolidate in a single assignment at the beginning of the function. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/16] xen/x86: p2m-pod: Use typesafe gfn in p2m_pod_decrease_reservation

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper Changes in v2: - Add Andrew's acked-by ---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] common/efi: give people some time to read messages when debugging

>>> On 20.09.17 at 22:57, wrote: > From: Tamas K Lengyel > > The EFI messages flash by so fast that it is impossible to catch them without > a serial debugger attached. Sometimes though we don't have that available so > having some time to read the

Re: [Xen-devel] pci-passthrough loses msi-x interrupts ability after domain destroy

>>> On 20.09.17 at 21:50, wrote: > - On Dom0, 'lspci -vv' on that PCIe device between the "working" and > the "muted interrupts" states, I noted a difference between the > MSI-X caps: > > - Capabilities: [70] MSI-X: Enable- Count=5 Masked- <-- IRQs will

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/perfc: Fix build after commit fc32575968 when CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=y

The commit fc32575968 "public/sysctl: drop unnecessary typedefs and handles" went a bit too far by replacing all xen_systcl_*_t type to struct xen_sysctl_*. However, xen_sysctl_perfc_val_t was a typedef on uint32_t and therefore is not associated to a structure. Use xen_sysctl_perfc_val_t to fix

[Xen-devel] About evtchn and netfront/netback changes

Hello guys, I'm porting some legacy code initially developed in Xen 4.0 and Linux 2.6 to longterm support kernels 3.2.93 and 4.4.88, and Xen 4.6 or 4.8 (not decided yet but that's not the key issue). My legacy work involves dealing with event channel and xen-netfront/netback drivers. However, I

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: Introduce get_hwdom_madt_size in gic_hw_operations

From: Manish Jaggi estimate_acpi_efi_size needs to be updated to provide correct size of hardware domains MADT, which now adds ITS information as well. Introducing gic_get_hwdom_madt_size. Signed-off-by: Manish Jaggi --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 7

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: ITS: Populate host_its_list from ACPI MADT Table

From: Manish Jaggi Added gicv3_its_acpi_init to update host_its_list from MADT table. For ACPI, host_its structure stores dt_node as NULL. Signed-off-by: Manish Jaggi --- xen/arch/arm/gic-v3-its.c| 24

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: ITS: Expose ITS in the MADT table

From: Manish Jaggi Add gicv3_its_make_hwdom_madt to update hwdom MADT ITS information. Signed-off-by: Manish Jaggi --- xen/arch/arm/gic-v3-its.c| 19 +++ xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c| 1 + xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_its.h |

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: ACPI: ITS: Add ITS Support for ACPI hardware domain

From: Manish Jaggi This patch is split into 5 patches. First two add support for updating host_its_list from ACPI MADT table. The rest patches provide support to update the hardware domain MADT table with ITS information. Changes since v3 - Set GICV3_ITS_SIZE as 128K -

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen: grant-table: Simplify get_paged_frame

The implementation of get_paged_frame is currently different whether the architecture support sharing memory or paging memory. Both version are extremely similar so it is possible to consolidate in a single implementation. The main difference is the x86 version will allow grant on foreign page

  1   2   >