[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 116260: regressions - FAIL

flight 116260 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116260/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 116215

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/13] x86/paravirt: Convert native patch assembly code strings to macros

On 17/11/17 20:42, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 08:10:13PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 17/11/17 19:07, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:58:24AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: Convert the hard-coded native patch assembly code strings to macros to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/13] x86/paravirt: Convert native patch assembly code strings to macros

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:20:06AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > +#define NATIVE_ZERO "xor " _REG_ARG1 ", " _REG_ARG1 > >>> > >>> NATIVE_ZERO_OUT > >>> > >>> I guess. NATIVE_ZERO reads like the native representation of 0 :-) > >> > >> NATIVE_ZERO_ARG1? > > > > On a slight

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 116272: regressions - FAIL

flight 116272 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116272/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 116190 Tests

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 116261: regressions - FAIL

flight 116261 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116261/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 116214 Tests which did

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.9-testing baseline-only test] 72463: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 72463 xen-4.9-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72463/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl7 xen-boot

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 116268: regressions - FAIL

flight 116268 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116268/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win10-i386 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 115643

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 72464: tolerable FAIL

flight 72464 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72464/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 10 debian-di-install fail like 72440

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 116305: regressions - FAIL

flight 116305 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116305/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 115190 Tests which

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 116299: regressions - FAIL

flight 116299 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116299/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-xsm 6 xen-build fail in 116219 REGR. vs. 115210 Tests which

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 116304: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 116304 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116304/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 115476 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 116302: regressions - FAIL

flight 116302 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116302/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115226

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 116309: regressions - FAIL

flight 116309 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116309/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 116207

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 116308: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 116308 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116308/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 116193 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2 7/7] xen/iommu: smmu-v3: Add Xen specific code to enable the ported driver

On 10/12/2017 10:36 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Sameer, > > Given this is all Arm specific. I am not sure why people like Andrew, Jan > have been added. > > Please use scripts/get_maintainers to find the list of maintainers per > patches and avoid to CC all of them on each patches. Ok. >

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 116275: regressions - FAIL

flight 116275 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116275/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539 Tests which did not