Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> We understand that emulated interrupt on the frontend side is completely not
>>> acceptable
Allow me to expand on that: Proper synchronization requires that the
exact position is communicated, not estimated. Just because the nominal
rate of the stream is known
Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> Front sound driver has no real interrupts, so
> playback/capture period passed interrupt needs to be emulated:
> this is done via timer. Add required timer operations,
> this is based on sound/drivers/dummy.c.
A 'real' sound card use the interrupt to synchronize th
Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 08/07/2017 01:27 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> You have to implement period interrupts (and the .pointer callback)
>> based on when the samples are actually moved from/to the backend.
>
> Do you think I can implement this in a slightly diffe
Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 08/07/2017 04:11 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> How does that interface work?
>
> For the buffer received in .copy_user/.copy_kernel we send
> a request to the backend and get response back (async) when it has copied
> the bytes into HW/mix
