[Xen-devel] Does Xen unstable tree work?

Hi, Xen unstable tree doesn't update for about one month, I saw staging tree has many new commit these days, how often does it merging? Does unstable tree still work? Best Regards, Xudong ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org

Re: [Xen-devel] Failure to boot HVM guest with more than 32 VCPUS

-Original Message- From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:20 PM To: Hao, Xudong xudong@intel.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Failure to boot HVM guest with more than 32 VCPUS Hao, Xudong xudong

Re: [Xen-devel] Failure to boot HVM guest with more than 32 VCPUS

-Original Message- From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 5:40 PM To: Hao, Xudong Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Failure to boot HVM guest with more than 32 VCPUS Hao, Xudong xudong@intel.com writes: Hi

Re: [Xen-devel] HVM guest max memory allocation

-Original Message- From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 6:07 PM To: Hao, Xudong Cc: Wei Liu; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wu, Feng; George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] HVM guest max memory allocation On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:21:06AM +, Hao

Re: [Xen-devel] HVM guest max memory allocation

-Original Message- From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 3:29 PM To: Hao, Xudong Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wu, Feng; wei.l...@citrix.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] HVM guest max memory allocation On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:04:53AM +, Hao

[Xen-devel] Failure to boot HVM guest with more than 32 VCPUS

Hi, In X86_64 platform, we noticed an issue that Xen boot a RHEL6u6 or Fedora22 guest, when configure the VCPU more than 32, the guest will fail to boot up. Guest config: memory = 2173 vcpus=33 vif = [ 'type=ioemu, mac=00:16:3e:7c:87:72,

[Xen-devel] HVM guest max memory allocation

Hi, When creating HVM guest(no balloon driver), what's the max memory we could set? We can get the current system free memory by xl info, but when configure the free memory to a HVM guest, it fail to boot up. Does Xen allocate additional memory when do VM creating? How many the additional

Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile

> -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 6:24 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile &

[Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile

Hi, Does anyone meet build OVMF failure? The ovmf is xen default repo: http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/ovmf.git, with latest commit af9785a9ed61daea52b47f0bf448f1f228beee1e, and OS is X86_64 RHEL6.6. ... make[1]: ***

Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile

> -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 6:19 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to com

Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile

ay, November 4, 2015 12:19 AM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:07:27AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote: > > Wei, > > &g

Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile

?= 256035e01a1aa5739e34f245f3b1e9e8ee204210 # Thu Jul 23 11:08:38 2015 +0100 > -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 5:59 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; wei.l...@citrix.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-dev

Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to compile

> -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 6:19 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ovmf fail to com

Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to get VT-d working on Supermicro X11SSZ-QF

VT-d is enabled by default on Xen, can you share the whole log of Xen “xl dmesg”? -Thanks Xudong From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Tamas K Lengyel Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 4:59 AM To: Xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to get VT-d working on Supermicro X11SSZ-QF

From log, ACPI table is not found in the system, not sure the reason. (XEN) ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0218): A valid RSDP was not found [20070126] Thanks -Xudong From: Tamas K Lengyel [mailto:tamas.k.leng...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:43 AM To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com&

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

Sure. I'll test it soon. Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 8:18 PM > To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@gmail.com> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabel

[Xen-devel] Recall: [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

Hao, Xudong would like to recall the message, "[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()". ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

assthrough > works without this bugfix: > > http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel=145172165010604 > > which is about to land in QEMU. I guess it doesn't work at all? > > I am asking because I would like to know the level of support we need to > provide > to igd pass

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

> -Original Message- > From: qemu-devel-bounces+xudong.hao=intel@nongnu.org [mailto:qemu- > devel-bounces+xudong.hao=intel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Gerd > Hoffmann > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:25 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> &

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

With latest qemu 7b8a354d4716, RHEL7.2 (with default kernel) VM still can't boot up with IGD. Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 4:48 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> &

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

> -Original Message- > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 6:46 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>; Lars Kurth > <lars

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

6 6:32 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>; Lars Kurth > <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Michael S. Tsirkin > <m...@redhat.com>; Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@gmail

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

I used 6bb9ead762bf749af11ea225fc2a74db1b93c105 yesterday, this version don't include commit 349a3b1cc. Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Cao jin [mailto:caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:01 AM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@inte

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

ntel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Gerd > Hoffmann > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:25 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Stefano > Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()

6 7:57 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>; Lars Kurth > <lars.kurth@gmail.com>; Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; Cao jin > <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com;

[Xen-devel] live migration from new platform to old platform

Does anyone experience for HVM live migration from new generation platform to old generation platform? For X86 got a failure from Broadwell to Haswell, both platforms used same Xen version 4.7.0 RC3. [root@bdw-ep1 feng]# xl migrate 21 hsw-ep1 ... migration target: Ready to receive domain.

Re: [Xen-devel] live migration from new platform to old platform

> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 3:39 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; Zhang, Haozhong > <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>; Xen-devel <xen-de

Re: [Xen-devel] live migration from new platform to old platform

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 5:47 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Xen-devel de...@lists.xenproject.org> > Cc: Zhang, Haozhong <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>; Wei Liu >

[Xen-devel] [BUG] Xen panic with VT-d PI

Xen 4.7 RC3 enabled VT-d PI(iommu=on,intpost), and created HVM guest with VF NIC assigned repeatedly, it will cause Xen panic(maybe 2 times ,5 times ,10 times). It's not a RC3 regression, at least this Xen commit 1bd52e1f got failure as well. HW: Intel Broadwell server, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen's LLC, UCNA and MEM testing show error messge"Failed to inject MSR"

+Wei Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Zhang, PengtaoX > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 1:07 PM > To: Xen-devel <xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org> > Cc: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Zhang, Haozhong > <haozhong.zh...@intel.com> > Subject

Re: [Xen-devel] qemu-traditional build problem for Xen 4.7.0 RC6

> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:59 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org > Subject:

[Xen-devel] qemu-traditional build problem for Xen 4.7.0 RC6

QEMU_TAG update to 698d6d6f8d095edadb0c23612b552a89dd3eee4c of traditional qemu in Config.mk, this commit is a branch stable-4.7 commit for qemu traditional. The master commit is 6e20809727261599e8527c456eb078c0e89139a1. It bring up a build error. commit 03c716e32912e288929a6e0d9c8729d208462d66

Re: [Xen-devel] build Xen tool fail

Thanks, I'll switch to staging and hope the fix will be merged to master soon. Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:23 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; xen-d

[Xen-devel] build Xen tool fail

Ian, A recent changes of tools evtchn cause a build failure with gcc 4.4.7, OS is RHEL6.5. Bad commit: commit b7f76a699dcfadc0a52ab45b33cc72dbf3a69e7b Author: Ian Campbell Date: Mon Jun 1 16:20:09 2015 +0100 tools: Refactor /dev/xen/evtchn wrappers into

Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen

> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad > Rzeszutek Wilk > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 9:21 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; wei.l...@citrix.com; > samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org >

Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen

> -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:54 PM > To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org>; Wei Liu > <wei.l...@citrix.com>; Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Konrad > Rzeszutek Wilk

[Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen

Hi, For Xen upstream master branch with commit 1949868d, After updating qemu-xen version from fcf6ac57 to 2ce1d30e, booting a pv-grub guest will fail. Attach the guest config file and Xen log. Best Regards, Xudong (XEN) Bad console= option '115200' (XEN) Bad console= option '8n1' Xen

Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen

> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad > Rzeszutek Wilk > Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 11:55 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wei Li

Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen

> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad > Rzeszutek Wilk > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:58 AM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; xen-devel@lists.xen.org &

Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen

> -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 12:58 AM > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > Cc: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; wei.l...@citrix.com; > samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org; st

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.9 RC4 test result

We performed Xen 4.9 RC4 testing on Intel Xeon Skylake, Broadwell, Haswell server platforms, verified many functional features on Xen 4.9. We'd like to share the result out. Most of features passed to testing on Xen 4.9 RC4, RAS and nested has some bugs. RAS: 1. xen-mceinj tool testing

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] repeated live migration for VM failed

George, The live migrate pass over 500+ times with this patch, I think it's fine to merge it into Xen 4.9. Tested-by: Xudong Hao <xudong@intel.com> Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Hao, >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.9 RC4 test result

Hi, Julien > -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:40 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Cc: n...@arm.com; Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap

[Xen-devel] [BUG] repeated live migration for VM failed

Bug detailed description: Create one RHEL7.3 HVM and do live migration continuously, while doing the 200+ or 300+ times live-migration, tool stack report error and migration failed. Environment : HW: Skylake server Xen: Xen 4.9.0 RC4 Dom0: Linux 4.11.0

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] repeated live migration for VM failed

itrix.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] repeated live migration for VM failed > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:18 AM, George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > On 22/05/17 07:35, Hao, Xudong wrote: > >> Bug deta

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash

> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Jan > Beulich > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:06 AM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; Julien Grall <j

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash

> -Original Message- > From: Zhang, Haozhong > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 9:45 AM > To: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>; Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash

> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 2:25 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Lars Kurth <la

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.10.0 RC1 test result

> -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 9:59 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; Julien Grall &l

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 7:23 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org>; Stefano Stabellini > <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Lars

[Xen-devel] Recall: [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

Hao, Xudong would like to recall the message, "[Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov". ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 7:23 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org>; Stefano Stabellini > <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Lars

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.10.0 RC1 test result

Hi Jan We have update of this issue and I sent mail two three days ago, maybe you haven't read it yet, but I think you'll read it soon. Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 4:24 PM > To:

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

> -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 9:50 PM > To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> > Cc: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>; > Quan

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 5:33 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org>; Stefano Stabellini > <sstabell...@kernel.org>

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash

> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 5:17 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Lars Kurth <la

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.10.0 RC1 test result

ere is one issue: L1 Windows8 booted failed for years, this issue got fixed from Xen d23afa63 as our monitor. We're doing L2 installation on Windows8 HyperV and I will update result here and wiki. Thanks, -Xudong From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:5

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

> -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 6:41 PM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>; > Quan Xu <quan@gmail.com> > Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.ku

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

e plan to introduce any bug system for Xen? Thanks, -Xudong > -Original Message- > From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 5:12 PM > To: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>; Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; Zhang, Pen

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 4:38 PM > To: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>; Anthony PERARD > <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; > sstabell...@

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.10.0 RC1 test result

We performed Xen 4.10 RC1 testing on Intel Xeon Skylake, Broadwell server, Intel Atom Denverton platforms, verified many functional features, which include new features Local MCE, L2 CAT and UMIP on Xen 4.10. We'd like to share the result out. Most of features passed to testing on Xen 4.10