On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:50:07AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 06:43 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 19/07/17 12:32, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:38:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> There are no current users which I can locate. One piece of xend which
>
On 07/19/2017 06:43 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/07/17 12:32, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:38:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> There are no current users which I can locate. One piece of xend which
>>> didn't
>>> move forwards into xl/libxl is this:
>>>
>>> # Configure
On 19/07/17 12:32, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:38:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> There are no current users which I can locate. One piece of xend which
>> didn't
>> move forwards into xl/libxl is this:
>>
>> # Configure host CPUID consistency checks, which must be satisfi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:38:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There are no current users which I can locate. One piece of xend which didn't
> move forwards into xl/libxl is this:
>
> # Configure host CPUID consistency checks, which must be satisfied for
> this
> # VM to be allowed to
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:54:19PM +, Christian Lindig wrote:
>
> > On 17. Jul 2017, at 13:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >
> > It turns out that Xapi has a library function using it, but that
> > function is dead so can be removed.
>
> I am fine with the removal of the OCaml bindings and the p
> On 17. Jul 2017, at 13:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> It turns out that Xapi has a library function using it, but that
> function is dead so can be removed.
I am fine with the removal of the OCaml bindings and the patch for the OCaml
code. If the code is fundamentally broken it should be remov
There are no current users which I can locate. One piece of xend which didn't
move forwards into xl/libxl is this:
# Configure host CPUID consistency checks, which must be satisfied for this
# VM to be allowed to run on this host's processor type:
#cpuid_check=[ '1:ecx=x