Re: [Xen-devel] [MirageOS-devel] [Minios-devel] [Xen-API] [RFC] Unicore Subproject Proposal

On 15.09.2017 11:35, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: On 15 Sep 2017, at 09:36, Simon Kuenzer > wrote: Hey Anil, On 13.09.2017 12:11, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: On 11 Sep 2017, at 13:08, Simon Kuenzer > wrote: Just my 2 cents: 1. Is thi

Re: [Xen-devel] [MirageOS-devel] [Minios-devel] [Xen-API] [RFC] Unicore Subproject Proposal

> On 15 Sep 2017, at 09:36, Simon Kuenzer wrote: > > Hey Anil, > > On 13.09.2017 12:11, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 13:08, Simon Kuenzer wrote: >>> Just my 2 cents: 1. Is this academic project, or it have specific goals and areas of application? Would be goo

Re: [Xen-devel] [MirageOS-devel] [Minios-devel] [Xen-API] [RFC] Unicore Subproject Proposal

On 13 Sep 2017, at 17:13, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > Anil Madhavapeddy, on mer. 13 sept. 2017 11:11:03 +0100, wrote: >> Maintaining a forked MiniOS has been a multi-year source of a maintenance >> burden for MirageOS, > > I'm just wondering why this happened? > > The mini-os reposi