On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 14:33 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 17/08/16 18:18, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Alternatively, we can actually _subtract_ some credits to a
> > yielding vcpu.
> > That will sort of make the effect of a call to yield last in time.
>
> But normally we want the yield to be temp
On 20/09/16 14:25, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 17/08/16 18:18, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> When a vcpu explicitly yields it is usually giving
>> us an advice of "let someone else run and come back
>> to me in a bit."
>>
>> Credit2 isn't, so far, doing anything when a vcpu
>> yields, which means an yield
On 17/08/16 18:18, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> When a vcpu explicitly yields it is usually giving
> us an advice of "let someone else run and come back
> to me in a bit."
>
> Credit2 isn't, so far, doing anything when a vcpu
> yields, which means an yield is basically a NOP (well,
> actually, it's pur
On 17/08/16 18:18, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> When a vcpu explicitly yields it is usually giving
> us an advice of "let someone else run and come back
> to me in a bit."
>
> Credit2 isn't, so far, doing anything when a vcpu
> yields, which means an yield is basically a NOP (well,
> actually, it's pur
