+shannon
On 24 May 2015 at 13:01, Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Parth,
On 24/05/2015 07:40, Parth Dixit wrote:
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
---
On 18 May 2015 at 18:56, Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Parth,
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
Hi Parth,
On 24/05/2015 07:40, Parth Dixit wrote:
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
On 17.05.15 at 22:03, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -87,16 +87,7 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
void __iomem *
acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
{
- if
On 20/05/15 17:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.05.15 at 22:03, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -87,16 +87,7 @@ acpi_physical_address __init
acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
void __iomem *
acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys,
Hi Parth,
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
index 935999e..096e9ef 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ subdir-$(arm32) += arm32
subdir-$(arm64) += arm64
subdir-y += platforms
On 18/05/15 15:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.15 at 15:26, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#include xen/acpi.h
+#include asm/mm.h
+
+void __iomem *
+acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address
On 18/05/15 15:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.15 at 16:20, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
Although, acpi_os_map_iomem is also part of the ACPI CA. Would a
function arch_acpi_os_map_memory suit for you?
Only if we - other than Linux - really need this to be arch dependent.
The current
On 18.05.15 at 16:20, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
Although, acpi_os_map_iomem is also part of the ACPI CA. Would a
function arch_acpi_os_map_memory suit for you?
Only if we - other than Linux - really need this to be arch dependent.
Jan
___
On 18.05.15 at 15:26, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#include xen/acpi.h
+#include asm/mm.h
+
+void __iomem *
+acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
+{
+return
10 matches
Mail list logo
