On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 17/10/16 17:28, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Andrew Cooper
>> wrote:
>>> On 14/10/16 20:36, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On a slightly separate note, as y
On 17/10/16 17:28, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>> On 14/10/16 20:36, Kyle Huey wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Cooper
>>> wrote:
On a slightly separate note, as you have just been a successful
guinea-pig for XTF, how did
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 14/10/16 20:36, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Cooper
>> wrote:
>>> On a slightly separate note, as you have just been a successful
>>> guinea-pig for XTF, how did you find it? It is a very new (still
>>> so
On 14/10/16 20:36, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>> On a slightly separate note, as you have just been a successful
>> guinea-pig for XTF, how did you find it? It is a very new (still
>> somewhat in development) system but the project is looking to tr
On 14/10/16 20:28, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> :) I am now curious as to which bit I missed.
> I made these changes.
>
> - Kyle
>
> ---
> tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c | 9 ++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c b/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On a slightly separate note, as you have just been a successful
> guinea-pig for XTF, how did you find it? It is a very new (still
> somewhat in development) system but the project is looking to try and
> improve regression testing in this
> :) I am now curious as to which bit I missed.
I made these changes.
- Kyle
---
tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c b/tests/cpuid-faulting/main.c
index 3e782a2..221567d 100644
--- a/tests/cpuid-fau
On 14/10/16 18:05, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>> On 14/10/16 13:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
@@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int emulate_forced_invalid
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 14/10/16 13:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>>> @@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int emulate_forced_invalid_op(struct
>>> cpu_user_regs *regs)
>>>
On 14/10/16 13:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> @@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int emulate_forced_invalid_op(struct
>> cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> /* We only emulate CPUID. */
>> if ( ( rc = copy_from_use
>>> On 13.10.16 at 23:09, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -1315,16 +1315,20 @@ static int emulate_forced_invalid_op(struct
> cpu_user_regs *regs)
> /* We only emulate CPUID. */
> if ( ( rc = copy_from_user(instr, (char *)eip, sizeof(instr))) != 0 )
11 matches
Mail list logo