On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.09.16 at 17:54, wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.09.16 at 17:14, wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.09.16 at 16:56, wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20
>>> On 20.09.16 at 17:54, wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.09.16 at 17:14, wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.09.16 at 16:56, wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.09.1
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.09.16 at 17:14, wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.09.16 at 16:56, wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19
>>> On 20.09.16 at 17:14, wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.09.16 at 16:56, wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.1
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Tamas K Lengyel
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:40 AM
>>
>> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> >> @@ -489,13 +489,16 @@ void hvm_do_resume(struct vcpu *v)
>> >>
>> >> if ( v->arch.v
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.09.16 at 16:56, wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
>> @@ -1793,7 +17
>>> On 20.09.16 at 16:56, wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
> @@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctx
On 09/20/2016 05:56 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
> @@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hv
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
@@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
>> *hvmemul_ctxt,
pfec |
>>> On 19.09.16 at 20:27, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
>>> @@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
> *hvmemul_ctxt,
>>> pfec |= PFEC_user_mode;
>>>
>>> hvmemul_ctxt->insn_buf_eip
> From: Tamas K Lengyel
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:40 AM
>
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> >> @@ -489,13 +489,16 @@ void hvm_do_resume(struct vcpu *v)
> >>
> >> if ( v->arch.vm_event->emulate_flags &
> >> VM_EVENT_FLA
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
>> @@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
>> *hvmemul_ctxt,
>> pfec |= PFEC_user_mode;
>>
>> hvmemul_ctxt->insn_buf_eip = regs->eip;
>> -if ( !vio->mmio_ins
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
>> @@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
>> *hvmemul_ctxt,
>> pfec |= PFEC_user_mode;
>>
>> hvmemul_ctxt->insn_buf_eip = regs->eip;
>> -if ( !vio->mmio_ins
>>> On 15.09.16 at 18:51, wrote:
> @@ -1793,7 +1793,17 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
> *hvmemul_ctxt,
> pfec |= PFEC_user_mode;
>
> hvmemul_ctxt->insn_buf_eip = regs->eip;
> -if ( !vio->mmio_insn_bytes )
> +
> +if ( unlikely(hvmemul_ctxt->set_conte
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> On 09/15/16 19:51, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> When emulating instructions Xen's emulator maintains a small i-cache fetched
>> from the guest memory. This patch extends the vm_event interface to allow
>> overwriting this i-cache via a buffer
On 09/15/16 19:51, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> When emulating instructions Xen's emulator maintains a small i-cache fetched
> from the guest memory. This patch extends the vm_event interface to allow
> overwriting this i-cache via a buffer returned in the vm_event response.
>
> When responding to a S
16 matches
Mail list logo