On 16-11-30 02:42:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.11.16 at 10:08, wrote:
> > On 16-11-29 02:43:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 29.11.16 at 05:38, wrote:
> >> > To make codes be better reviewable, I propose below three suggestions:
> >> > 1) I write a design document about refactor to make y
>>> On 30.11.16 at 10:08, wrote:
> On 16-11-29 02:43:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 29.11.16 at 05:38, wrote:
>> > To make codes be better reviewable, I propose below three suggestions:
>> > 1) I write a design document about refactor to make you more easily
>> > understand the ideas.
>>
>> T
On 16-11-29 02:43:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.11.16 at 05:38, wrote:
> > To make codes be better reviewable, I propose below three suggestions:
> > 1) I write a design document about refactor to make you more easily
> > understand the ideas.
>
> This is appreciated, but I don't think it's
>>> On 29.11.16 at 05:38, wrote:
> To make codes be better reviewable, I propose below three suggestions:
> 1) I write a design document about refactor to make you more easily
> understand the ideas.
This is appreciated, but I don't think it's strictly necessary. Describing
the new design (rathe
On 16-11-25 09:57:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.11.16 at 17:27, wrote:
> On 25.10.16 at 05:40, wrote:
> >> 'cbm_len' and 'cbm_max' are CAT/CDP specific feature HW info.
> >> So encapsulate them into 'struct psr_cat_hw_info'. If new
> >> feature is supported, we can define other structur
>>> On 25.11.16 at 17:27, wrote:
On 25.10.16 at 05:40, wrote:
>> 'cbm_len' and 'cbm_max' are CAT/CDP specific feature HW info.
>> So encapsulate them into 'struct psr_cat_hw_info'. If new
>> feature is supported, we can define other structure to save
>> its HW info.
>
> Part of my problem f
>>> On 25.10.16 at 05:40, wrote:
> 'cbm_len' and 'cbm_max' are CAT/CDP specific feature HW info.
> So encapsulate them into 'struct psr_cat_hw_info'. If new
> feature is supported, we can define other structure to save
> its HW info.
Part of my problem following you here is that you talk about
cb
