On 09/23/2016 04:59 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:37:27AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:36:27PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 09/21/2016 06:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
If the distance is too big we are in trouble - as
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:37:27AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:36:27PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > On 09/21/2016 06:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > If the distance is too big we are in trouble - as our relocation
> > > distance can surely be
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:36:27PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 09/21/2016 06:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > If the distance is too big we are in trouble - as our relocation
> > distance can surely be clipped, or still have a valid width - but
> > cause an overflow of distance.
> >
On 09/21/2016 06:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
If the distance is too big we are in trouble - as our relocation
distance can surely be clipped, or still have a valid width - but
cause an overflow of distance.
On various architectures the maximum displacement for a unconditional
Hi Konrad,
On 21/09/16 18:32, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/livepatch.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/livepatch.h
index 929c7d9..482d74f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/livepatch.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/livepatch.h
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
#ifndef __XEN_ARM_LIVEPATCH_H__
