Thanks Jianfeng for giving new ideas.
There is not much activity on Xen side.
Is there someone working on DPDK+Xen? Any news?
The technical board requested to re-consider Xen support in DPDK.
It will be discussed in the next techboard meeting:
https://annuel.framapad.org/p/r.0c3cc4d1e0112
Hi Thomas and all,
Apologize for being an unqualified maintainer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 6:04 AM
> To: Joao Martins; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; d...@dpdk.org; Xen-devel
>
Ping
The Xen dom0 support in DPDK seems dead.
Reminder:
Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not
fixed yet:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html
The request (9 months ago) was to g
2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins:
> On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> >> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
> >>> So we do have an prot
On 02/20/2017 09:56 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
>>> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
So
On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
>> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
>>> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
>> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
>> > > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
>> > So we do have an prototype implementation of netba
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> > > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
> > So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting
> > for review of xen-devel to the spec.
> >
>
Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting
for review of xen-devel to the spec.
And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0
parts of code in DP
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>
>> Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK?
>>
>> I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community.
>> Last time we talked about, it was because
Le 16/02/2017 à 12:06, Thomas Monjalon a écrit :
The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html
Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
yes
___
Xen-devel mailing
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng:
> > Hi Thomas and Konrad,
> >
> > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
> > >>> As s
2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng:
> Hi Thomas and Konrad,
>
> On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
> >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
> >>> continue su
Hi Thomas and Konrad,
On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the
m
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the
>> maintainer of all xen-related files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan
15 matches
Mail list logo