Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL"): > There are now in Linux 4.9 stable branch. Now the testing is blocked > because of again local migration [1]. The migration test seem less > reliable than the Arndale these days... is there

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-19 Thread Julien Grall
On 13/06/17 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote: Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL"): So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that particular board, I guess? Yes, indeed. This has been broken for some time. (If this

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL"): > So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that > particular board, I guess? Yes, indeed. This has been broken for some time. > (If this was known and being looke

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-13 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 03:58 +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 110371 linux-4.9 real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: >