Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions -
FAIL"):
> There are now in Linux 4.9 stable branch. Now the testing is blocked
> because of again local migration [1]. The migration test seem less
> reliable than the Arndale these days... is there anything we can do?
I have an osstest branch which we think will help with the Windows
migration problems. It's currently in the osstest self-push-gate.
You'll see from my mail earlier today that I force pushed linux-4.9.
Currently I'm waiting for Juergen to tell me whether (if we know) the
bugs fixed by his series "xen/blkback: several fixes of resource
management" are present in earlier versions of Linux, such as the 3.18
that osstest is currently using.
If those bugs are present there too then moving to Linux 4.9 would not
be a regression introducing heisenbugs. If they are then I think we
should still wait (and hope that Linux 4.9 doesn't break any further).
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL
On 13/06/17 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions -
FAIL"):
So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that
particular board, I guess?
Yes, indeed. This has been broken for some time.
(If this was known and being looked up already, sorry for the noise.)
Julien has requested a backport of a relevant Linux patch; that was
"queued" by Greg K-H on Monday.
Normally it seems to take a week (or even two) from that happening
before the fix actually ends up in the linux-4.9.y stable branch on
kernel.org :-/.
This is, ultimately, blocking moving osstest to use Linux 4.9...
There are now in Linux 4.9 stable branch. Now the testing is blocked
because of again local migration [1]. The migration test seem less
reliable than the Arndale these days... is there anything we can do?
Cheers,
[1] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110535/
--
Julien Grall
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions -
FAIL"):
> So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that
> particular board, I guess?
Yes, indeed. This has been broken for some time.
> (If this was known and being looked up already, sorry for the noise.)
Julien has requested a backport of a relevant Linux patch; that was
"queued" by Greg K-H on Monday.
Normally it seems to take a week (or even two) from that happening
before the fix actually ends up in the linux-4.9.y stable branch on
kernel.org :-/.
This is, ultimately, blocking moving osstest to use Linux 4.9...
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 03:58 +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 110371 linux-4.9 real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. > vs. 107358 > This caught my attention because of the 'credit2' part. I therefore went checking and noticed from here: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/ALL and here: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/ALL That the test has been repeatedly failing, when on the linux-4.9 branch, always on arndale-bluewater. I've checked a couple of serial logs of failing flights, and they all look similar. I've then looked here: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/arndale-bluewater.html And seen that other jobs (not only -credit2 ones) are failing as well, and in similar ways, when using the linux-4.9 branch: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/info.html http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd/info.html Finally, test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 passes, on arndale-bluewater, when on the linux-linus branch. So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that particular board, I guess? (If this was known and being looked up already, sorry for the noise.) Regards, Dario -- <> (Raistlin Majere) - Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R Ltd., Cambridge (UK) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
