Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
> Hopefully I should be able to filter on "X-Osstest-Failures includes
> "linux-linus:".
The first report from the restarted tests is below:
osstest service owne
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
> Shouldn't this be:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Err, yes, thanks.
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing li
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:27:52PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 =
> can't bootup"):
> > I can give it a try although I have practically no experience with
> > OSSTest. Is there a way to sub
Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
> Hopefully I should be able to filter on "X-Osstest-Failures includes
> "linux-linus:".
Indeed.
> > linux-linus
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux
On 01/13/2017 11:27 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> osstest's reports are posted to xen-devel. To give you an example of
> what they look like, I have pasted below the top of the report from
> last test report of linux-linus (including interesting mail headers).
>
> If you find the mail filtering of xe
Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
> I can give it a try although I have practically no experience with
> OSSTest. Is there a way to subscribe to notifications for those tests?
osstest's reports are posted to
On 01/13/2017 03:31 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 11:22 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 01/12/2017 07:50 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> I don't think we do that any longer, and that may be part of the
>>> reason
>>> why we missed this one?
>> I believe you needed to be on a m
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 11:22 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/12/2017 07:50 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > I don't think we do that any longer, and that may be part of the
> > reason
> > why we missed this one?
>
> I believe you needed to be on a multi-socket system to catch this
> bug.
> That'
On 01/12/2017 01:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
Anyway, we should have some multi-socket boxes on OSSTest, AFAICR.
I think we do but I haven't got a systematic way of answering that
qu
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
> Anyway, we should have some multi-socket boxes on OSSTest, AFAICR.
I think we do but I haven't got a systematic way of answering that
question other than by manual eyeballing of the
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't
bootup"):
> Maybe it's me misremembering/saying stupid things, but I recall that at
> some point we were testing some of the recent and in development Linux
> branches in OSSTest.
We use
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 11:22 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/12/2017 07:50 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > I don't think we do that any longer, and that may be part of the
> > reason
> > why we missed this one?
>
> I believe you needed to be on a multi-socket system to catch this
> bug.
> That'
On 01/12/2017 07:50 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 22:13 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 01/04/2017 09:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:52:03PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>>> wrote:
I was trying to bootup on an 30 CPU machine (15 core,
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 22:13 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 09:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:52:03PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > wrote:
> > > I was trying to bootup on an 30 CPU machine (15 core, SMT).
> > >
> > > It works just fine with cred
> Latest 4.10-rc2 boots both credit1 and credit2. So you can either try
> that or apply 9d85eb9119f4eeeb48e87adfcd71f752655700e9, which I think
> is the missing patch.
And this patch has just been queued for 4.9-stable.
-boris
___
Xen-devel mailing
On 05/01/2017 08:39, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 02:05 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/01/2017 01:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
>>> but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging during bootup.
>>>
>>> I am a going to
On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 02:05 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 01:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
> > but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging during bootup.
> >
> > I am a going to naively assume it is due to how the vCPUs a
On 01/04/2017 09:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:52:03PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey,
I was trying to bootup on an 30 CPU machine (15 core, SMT).
It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging duri
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:52:03PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was trying to bootup on an 30 CPU machine (15 core, SMT).
>
> It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
> but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging during bootup.
>
> I am a going to naively assum
On 05/01/2017 01:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was trying to bootup on an 30 CPU machine (15 core, SMT).
>
> It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
> but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging during bootup.
>
> I am a going to naively assume it is due to how the v
20 matches
Mail list logo
