On 14/02/2019 00:21, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>
> This was submitted in 2015 here
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=142807132515973=2
>
> and has been included in Fedora builds ever since. No issues have been
> reported with the patch.
>
> P.
>
> 8<
>
On 14/02/2019 15:23, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> If there are exported DMA buffers which are still in use and
> grant device is closed by either normal user-space close or by
> a signal this leads to the grant device context to be destroyed,
> thus making
On 14/02/2019 15:23, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> Check if there are any imported dma-bufs left not released by
> user-space when grant device's release callback is called and
> free those if this is the case. This can happen if user-space
> leaks the
flight 133265 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133265/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 6 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 133205
flight 133286 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133286/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen 365aabb6e5023cee476adf81106729efd49c644f
baseline version:
xen
flight 133272 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133272/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 132941
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13
flight 133274 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133274/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs.
129313
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next
head: 137d14ed474f7b652fc3ca58bf3b10c9cf4c09a1
commit: 137d14ed474f7b652fc3ca58bf3b10c9cf4c09a1 [7/7] x86/xen: dont add memory
above max allowed allocation
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-02172339 (attached as .config)
Hi all,
Commits
28df69acbd27 ("xen-scsiback: mark expected switch fall-through")
7bb17e0ca4a5 ("xen: mark expected switch fall-through")
are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgp5QIMhd188Y.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
Dongli Zhang, le mar. 12 févr. 2019 12:11:20 +0800, a ecrit:
> On 02/12/2019 06:10 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hans van Kranenburg, le lun. 11 févr. 2019 22:59:11 +0100, a ecrit:
> >> On 2/11/19 2:37 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2/10/19 12:35 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next
head: 137d14ed474f7b652fc3ca58bf3b10c9cf4c09a1
commit: 137d14ed474f7b652fc3ca58bf3b10c9cf4c09a1 [7/7] x86/xen: dont add memory
above max allowed allocation
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-02180405 (attached as .config)
On 2/18/19 5:29 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Dongli Zhang, le mar. 12 févr. 2019 12:11:20 +0800, a ecrit:
>> On 02/12/2019 06:10 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Hans van Kranenburg, le lun. 11 févr. 2019 22:59:11 +0100, a ecrit:
On 2/11/19 2:37 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>
>
flight 133275 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133275/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm broken in 133239
build-arm64
flight 133276 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133276/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
132748
Tests which
Hi, Dario
> On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 06:15 +, zheng chuan wrote:
> > Hi, Dario,
> >
> Hi,
>
> > Here is the xentrace in credit2 with ratelimiting 1 ms and 30ms by
> > observing 1 seconds both.
> >
> Ok, thanks a lot for doing this! I'm doing my own experiments, but slower than
> I wanted to, as
flight 133278 xen-4.10-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133278/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvopsbroken in 133245
flight 133280 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133280/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail REGR. vs.
132911
Tests
>>> On 17.02.19 at 09:29, wrote:
First of all - please don't top-post, and please don't send private mail
in response to a public discussion which might benefit others as well.
> I have done all research and investigation but i am unable to solve
> this problem.
> None of what is being said in
18 matches
Mail list logo
