On 10/08/18 14:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.08.18 at 13:52, wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
>> @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void)
>>
>> if (!(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED)) {
>> pr_info("Using
>>> On 10.08.18 at 13:52, wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
> @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void)
>
> if (!(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED)) {
> pr_info("Using hypercall for remote TLB flush\n");
> -
Instead of using six globally visible paravirt ops structures combine
them in a single structure, keeping the original structures as
sub-structures.
This avoids the need to assemble struct paravirt_patch_template at
runtime on the stack each time apply_paravirt() is being called (i.e.
when loading
