On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christoffer, Eric, Marc,
> a question about locking order between multiple IRQs below. Could you
> have a brief look, please?
>
> On 13/02/18 12:30, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 09/02/18 14:39, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>>
On 13/02/18 14:56, Andre Przywara wrote:
diff --git a/xen/common/list_sort.c b/xen/common/list_sort.c
new file mode 100644
index 00..9c5cc58e43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/common/list_sort.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * list_sort.c: merge sort implementation for linked lists
+ * Copied from th
Hi,
Christoffer, Eric, Marc,
a question about locking order between multiple IRQs below. Could you
have a brief look, please?
On 13/02/18 12:30, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 09/02/18 14:39, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Adds the sorting function to cover the case where you have more IRQs
>>
Hi Andre,
On 09/02/18 14:39, Andre Przywara wrote:
Adds the sorting function to cover the case where you have more IRQs
to consider than you have LRs. We consider their priorities.
This pulls in Linux' list_sort.c , which is a merge sort implementation
for linked lists.
This is based on Linux c
Adds the sorting function to cover the case where you have more IRQs
to consider than you have LRs. We consider their priorities.
This pulls in Linux' list_sort.c , which is a merge sort implementation
for linked lists.
This is based on Linux commit 8e4447457965, written by Christoffer Dall.
Sign
