On 22/05/2020 14:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 22/05/2020 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 22.05.2020 13:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
That being said, I also don't like the fact that logdity is handled
differently between
On 22.05.2020 12:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/05/2020 11:05, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> On 22/05/2020 10:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 21/05/2020 22:43, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/05/2020 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 22.05.2020 13:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> That being said, I also don't like the fact that logdity is handled
> >> differently between EPT and NPT, as on EPT it's handled as a
> >>
On 22/05/2020 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.05.2020 13:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> That being said, I also don't like the fact that logdity is handled
>> differently between EPT and NPT, as on EPT it's handled as a
>> misconfig while on NPT it's handled as a violation.
> Because, well, there
On 22.05.2020 13:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> That being said, I also don't like the fact that logdity is handled
> differently between EPT and NPT, as on EPT it's handled as a
> misconfig while on NPT it's handled as a violation.
Because, well, there is no concept of misconfig in NPT.
Jan
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:27:38AM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 22/05/2020 11:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:14:24AM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> >> On 22/05/2020 11:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>
On 22/05/2020 11:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:14:24AM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> On 22/05/2020 11:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
On 22/05/2020 11:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/05/2020 11:05, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> On 22/05/2020 10:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 21/05/2020 22:43, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:14:24AM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 22/05/2020 11:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> >> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
> >> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's
On 22/05/2020 11:05, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 22/05/2020 10:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 21/05/2020 22:43, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
>>> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
>>> US bit has been
On 22/05/2020 11:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
>> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
>> US bit has been re-instated in PTE and any real
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
> US bit has been re-instated in PTE and any real fault would be correctly
> re-raised next time.
>
On 22/05/2020 10:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 21/05/2020 22:43, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
>> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
>> US bit has been re-instated in PTE and any real fault would be correctly
On 21/05/2020 22:43, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
> US bit has been re-instated in PTE and any real fault would be correctly
> re-raised next time.
>
> This covers a
On 21/05/2020 22:43, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
> US bit has been re-instated in PTE and any real fault would be correctly
> re-raised next time.
>
> This covers a
15 matches
Mail list logo