On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:36:40AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:59:20AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > If this works in all case
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:59:20AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > If this works in all cases (build with tools with and without PE support,
> > > xen.efi and xen.gz
>>> On 11.07.18 at 11:02, wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:48:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 11.07.18 at 10:29, wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> Another possible thing to try might be to make the extern declaration
>> >> of the symbol wea
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:59:20AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:48:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 11.07.18 at 10:29, wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wro
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:48:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.07.18 at 10:29, wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Another possible thing to try might be to make the extern declaration
> >> of the symbol weak, and drop the offending line altogethe
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:48:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 11.07.18 at 10:29, wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> Another possible thing to try might be to make the extern decl
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:48:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.07.18 at 10:29, wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Another possible thing to try might be to make the extern declaration
> >> of the symbol weak, and drop the offending line altogethe
>>> On 11.07.18 at 10:29, wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Another possible thing to try might be to make the extern declaration
>> of the symbol weak, and drop the offending line altogether.
>
> Oh, that didn't occur to me, and does seem to work. Below is
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:09:30AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 17:35, wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:09:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 10.07.18 at 15:49, wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:
>>> On 10.07.18 at 17:35, wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:09:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 10.07.18 at 15:49, wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:09:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 15:49, wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> >> Sorry for asking s
>>> On 10.07.18 at 15:49, wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >> Sorry for asking so many questions, but I would like to try to avoid
>> >> the DEFINED co
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> Sorry for asking so many questions, but I would like to try to avoid
> >> the DEFINED conditional in the linker script if possib
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
[...]
> >> Sorry for asking so many questions, but I would like to try to avoid
> >> the DEFINED conditional in the linker script i
>>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper w
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 0
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > >>> On 03.07.18 at 18:02, wr
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 03.07.18 at 18:02, wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wro
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 03.07.18 at 18:02, wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> >>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
> > >> >lld (the llv
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.07.18 at 18:02, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
> >> >lld (the llvm linker) has some issues with Xen linker script. It
> >> >doesn't under
>>> On 03.07.18 at 18:02, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
>> >lld (the llvm linker) has some issues with Xen linker script. It
>> >doesn't understand '||' in assert expressions:
>> >
>> >ld-melf_x86_64_fbsd -T
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:02:27PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
> > >lld (the llvm linker) has some issues with Xen linker script. It
> > >doesn't understand '||' in assert expressions:
> > >
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
> >lld (the llvm linker) has some issues with Xen linker script. It
> >doesn't understand '||' in assert expressions:
> >
> >ld-melf_x86_64_fbsd -T xen.lds -N prelink.o --build-id=sha1 \
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:35:24PM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
> >lld (the llvm linker) has some issues with Xen linker script. It
> >doesn't understand '||' in assert expressions:
> >
> >ld-melf_x86_64_fbsd -T xen.lds -N prelink.o --build-id=sha1 \
>
>>> Roger Pau Monne 06/28/18 5:38 PM >>>
>lld (the llvm linker) has some issues with Xen linker script. It
>doesn't understand '||' in assert expressions:
>
>ld-melf_x86_64_fbsd -T xen.lds -N prelink.o --build-id=sha1 \
>/root/src/xen/xen/common/symbols-dummy.o -o /root/src/xen/xen/.xen-syms.
25 matches
Mail list logo