On 05/22/2018 12:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.05.18 at 13:21, wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 11:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.05.18 at 16:16, wrote:
Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend;
>>>
>>> Is that
>>> On 22.05.18 at 13:21, wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 11:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.05.18 at 16:16, wrote:
>>> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend;
>>
>> Is that really the case? I though S3 was pretty "normal"
On 05/22/2018 11:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.05.18 at 16:16, wrote:
>> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend;
>
> Is that really the case? I though S3 was pretty "normal" these days.
>
>> but most bugs we'll run across won't need actual S3
On 22/05/18 11:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.05.18 at 16:16, wrote:
>> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend;
> Is that really the case? I though S3 was pretty "normal" these days.
I don't think I've never encountered a server without S3,
>>> On 21.05.18 at 17:33, wrote:
> On 05/21/2018 03:28 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 21/05/18 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend; but most
>>> bugs we'll run across won't need actual S3 to trigger. Add a
>>>
>>> On 21.05.18 at 16:16, wrote:
> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend;
Is that really the case? I though S3 was pretty "normal" these days.
> but most bugs we'll run across won't need actual S3 to trigger.
Not sure about this one either: In
On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 16:33 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/21/2018 03:28 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 21/05/18 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend; but
> > > most
> > > bugs we'll run across won't need actual S3 to trigger. Add a
>
On 05/21/2018 03:28 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 21/05/18 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend; but most
>> bugs we'll run across won't need actual S3 to trigger. Add a
>> command-line parameter for a "fake" S3, which will do everything
>>
On 21/05/18 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
> Most server-class hardware doesn't support ACPI S3 suspend; but most
> bugs we'll run across won't need actual S3 to trigger. Add a
> command-line parameter for a "fake" S3, which will do everything
> during suspend/restore except actually calling into