>>> Andrew Cooper 03/09/18 6:06 PM >>>
>On 09/03/18 17:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.03.18 at 14:18, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> @@ -426,8 +426,8 @@ static bool emulation_flags_ok(const struct domain *d,
>>> uint32_t emflags)
>>> return tr
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
In future patches, the structure will be extended with further information,
and this is far cleaner than adding extra parameters.
One minor tweak is that the setting of guest_type needs to be deferred until
config is known-good to derefere
On 09/03/18 17:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.03.18 at 14:18, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -426,8 +426,8 @@ static bool emulation_flags_ok(const struct domain *d,
>> uint32_t emflags)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -int arch_domain_create(struc
>>> On 09.03.18 at 14:18, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -426,8 +426,8 @@ static bool emulation_flags_ok(const struct domain *d,
> uint32_t emflags)
> return true;
> }
>
> -int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, unsigned int domcr_flags,
> -
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:18:41PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In future patches, the structure will be extended with further information,
> and this is far cleaner than adding extra parameters.
>
> One minor tweak is that the setting of guest_type needs to be deferred until
> config is known-go
