Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/mmcfg/drhd: Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call before calling acpi_parse_dmar()
在 2018/8/22 16:42, Roger Pau Monné 写道: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:39:05PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: 在 2018/8/22 15:36, Roger Pau Monné 写道: On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 09:53:08PM -0700, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: pci_conf_read8() needs pci mmcfg mapping to work on multiple pci segments system such as HPE Superdome-Flex. Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call in acpi_boot_init() before calling acpi_parse_dmar() so that when pci_conf_read8() is called in acpi_parse_dev_scope(), we already have the mapping set up. mmio_ro_ranges initialization is also moved ahead as it's the only dependency of pci_mmcfg_arch_enable() need to be moved. Also checked codes between the old and new call sites to ensure we don't break anything. Furthermore MMCFG will continue to not work this early (or more precisely not at all until Dom0 boot has progressed far enough) if the range(s) isn't/aren't marked reserved in E820. Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan Tested-by: Gopalasetty, Manoj LGTM: Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks for reviewing. I'm however failing to find patch 1/2 in this series. Could you please make sure threading is setup correctly? Hmm, how to make that happen, do you mean sending the two patches in a bunch? patch 1/2 is '[PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mmcfg: Rename pt_pci_init() and call it in acpi_mmcfg_init()" It's acked in v2, so there is no v3 for patch 1/2. Oh, I see. So you have two choices here: either send patch 1/2 with the Ack together with patch 2/2, or just drop the 2/2 prefix and send the patch alone. But sending v3 2/2 without v3 1/2 makes people think there's a v3 1/2 lost somewhere IMO. Understand, I'll resend the two again. Thanks Zhenzhong ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/mmcfg/drhd: Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call before calling acpi_parse_dmar()
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:39:05PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > 在 2018/8/22 15:36, Roger Pau Monné 写道: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 09:53:08PM -0700, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > > > pci_conf_read8() needs pci mmcfg mapping to work on multiple pci > > > segments system such as HPE Superdome-Flex. > > > > > > Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call in acpi_boot_init() before calling > > > acpi_parse_dmar() so that when pci_conf_read8() is called in > > > acpi_parse_dev_scope(), we already have the mapping set up. > > > > > > mmio_ro_ranges initialization is also moved ahead as it's the only > > > dependency of pci_mmcfg_arch_enable() need to be moved. Also > > > checked codes between the old and new call sites to ensure we > > > don't break anything. > > > > > > Furthermore MMCFG will continue to not work this early (or > > > more precisely not at all until Dom0 boot has progressed far > > > enough) if the range(s) isn't/aren't marked reserved in E820. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan > > > Tested-by: Gopalasetty, Manoj > > > > LGTM: > > > > Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné > Thanks for reviewing. > > > > I'm however failing to find patch 1/2 in this series. Could you please > > make sure threading is setup correctly? > Hmm, how to make that happen, do you mean sending the two patches in a > bunch? > patch 1/2 is '[PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mmcfg: Rename pt_pci_init() and call it in > acpi_mmcfg_init()" > > It's acked in v2, so there is no v3 for patch 1/2. Oh, I see. So you have two choices here: either send patch 1/2 with the Ack together with patch 2/2, or just drop the 2/2 prefix and send the patch alone. But sending v3 2/2 without v3 1/2 makes people think there's a v3 1/2 lost somewhere IMO. Thanks, Roger. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/mmcfg/drhd: Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call before calling acpi_parse_dmar()
在 2018/8/22 15:36, Roger Pau Monné 写道: On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 09:53:08PM -0700, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: pci_conf_read8() needs pci mmcfg mapping to work on multiple pci segments system such as HPE Superdome-Flex. Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call in acpi_boot_init() before calling acpi_parse_dmar() so that when pci_conf_read8() is called in acpi_parse_dev_scope(), we already have the mapping set up. mmio_ro_ranges initialization is also moved ahead as it's the only dependency of pci_mmcfg_arch_enable() need to be moved. Also checked codes between the old and new call sites to ensure we don't break anything. Furthermore MMCFG will continue to not work this early (or more precisely not at all until Dom0 boot has progressed far enough) if the range(s) isn't/aren't marked reserved in E820. Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan Tested-by: Gopalasetty, Manoj LGTM: Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks for reviewing. I'm however failing to find patch 1/2 in this series. Could you please make sure threading is setup correctly? Hmm, how to make that happen, do you mean sending the two patches in a bunch? patch 1/2 is '[PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mmcfg: Rename pt_pci_init() and call it in acpi_mmcfg_init()" It's acked in v2, so there is no v3 for patch 1/2. Thanks Zhenzhong ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/mmcfg/drhd: Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call before calling acpi_parse_dmar()
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 09:53:08PM -0700, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > pci_conf_read8() needs pci mmcfg mapping to work on multiple pci > segments system such as HPE Superdome-Flex. > > Move acpi_mmcfg_init() call in acpi_boot_init() before calling > acpi_parse_dmar() so that when pci_conf_read8() is called in > acpi_parse_dev_scope(), we already have the mapping set up. > > mmio_ro_ranges initialization is also moved ahead as it's the only > dependency of pci_mmcfg_arch_enable() need to be moved. Also > checked codes between the old and new call sites to ensure we > don't break anything. > > Furthermore MMCFG will continue to not work this early (or > more precisely not at all until Dom0 boot has progressed far > enough) if the range(s) isn't/aren't marked reserved in E820. > > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan > Tested-by: Gopalasetty, Manoj LGTM: Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné I'm however failing to find patch 1/2 in this series. Could you please make sure threading is setup correctly? Thanks, Roger. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
