>>> On 21.02.18 at 15:02, wrote:
> The current prototype is slightly confusing because it takes a guest
> physical address and a machine physical frame (not address!). Switching to
> MFN will improve safety and reduce the chance to mistakenly invert the
> 2 parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien g
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 02:02:56PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> The current prototype is slightly confusing because it takes a guest
> physical address and a machine physical frame (not address!). Switching to
> MFN will improve safety and reduce the chance to mistakenly invert the
> 2 parameters.
