Hi,
I am slightly confused. I receive your answer on this e-mail after you
resend a version. So were the comments on RFC v4 was addressed?
On 02/09/2018 05:56 PM, Sameer Goel wrote:
/* Request interrupt lines */
irq = smmu->evtq.q.irq;
@@ -2316,9 +2782,13 @@ static int arm_smm
On 1/23/2018 8:18 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Sameer,
>
> On 19/12/17 03:17, Sameer Goel wrote:
>> + if (!dtprop)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!dtprop->value)
>> + return -ENODATA;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Xen: Helpers
Hi Sameer,
On 19/12/17 03:17, Sameer Goel wrote:
This driver follows an approach similar to smmu driver. The intent here
is to reuse as much Linux code as possible.
- Glue code has been introduced to bridge the API calls.
- Called Linux functions from the Xen IOMMU function calls.
- Xen modifica
Hi,
On 16/01/18 12:37, Manish Jaggi wrote:
On 01/16/2018 02:04 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 01/03/2018 05:47 AM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
+int devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
irq_handler_t handler,
+ irq_handler_t thread_fn, unsigned long irqflags,
+
Hi Julien,
On 01/16/2018 02:04 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 01/03/2018 05:47 AM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
Hi Sameer,
Hi Manish,
+
+/* Xen: Type definitions for iommu_domain */
+#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED 0
+#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA 1
+#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY 2
+
+/* Xen: Dummy iommu_
On 01/03/2018 05:47 AM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
Hi Sameer,
Hi Manish,
+
+/* Xen: Type definitions for iommu_domain */
+#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED 0
+#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA 1
+#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY 2
+
+/* Xen: Dummy iommu_domain */
+struct iommu_domain {
+ /* Runtime SMMU conf
Hi Sameer,
Comments on this patch are only for nomenclature...
On 12/19/2017 08:47 AM, Sameer Goel wrote:
This driver follows an approach similar to smmu driver. The intent here
is to reuse as much Linux code as possible.
- Glue code has been introduced to bridge the API calls.
- Called Linux
