On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:59:26PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:09:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Paul Durrant writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
> > Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> > > On Fri,
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:09:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Paul Durrant writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
> Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > > Jürgen Groß
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl: Overhaul
passthrough setting logic"):
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:09:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Bikeshed colour Paul Juergen George Ian Anthony Wei #already
> >
> > unknown
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:09:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Paul Durrant writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
> Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > > Jürgen Groß
Paul Durrant writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >
> > Jürgen Groß writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
> >
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Jürgen Groß writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
> Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> > On 11.10.19 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I do not have a strong opinion about this.
Jürgen Groß writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> On 11.10.19 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I do not have a strong opinion about this. I would be happy with
> > "auto" (or "default" mayb
On 11.10.19 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
LIBXL_PASSTHROUGH_UNKNOWN (aka "ENABLED" in an earlier uncommitted
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> libxl treats Arm guest as PVH now. Note that we seamlessly convert
> PV to PVH in libxl__arch_domain_{build, create}_info_setdefault().
>
> So as long as th
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
> > LIBXL_PASSTHROUGH_UNKNOWN (aka "ENABLED" in an earlier uncommitted
> > version of t
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:12 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> LIBXL_PASSTHROUGH_UNKNOWN (aka "ENABLED" in an earlier uncommitted
> version of this code) is doing double duty. We actually need all of
> the following to be specificable:
> * default ("unknown"): enable PT iff we have devices to
> pas
Hi,
On 11/10/2019 10:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 10/10/2019 16:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
index 69971c97b6..fccb6a6271 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
@@ -968,6 +957,50 @@ int libxl__domain
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl: Overhaul
passthrough setting logic"):
> On 10/10/2019 16:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > +if (c_info->passthrough == LIBXL_PASSTHROUGH_DISABLED && need_pt) {
> > +LOGD(ERROR, domid,
> > + "passthrough disabled but
On 10/10/2019 16:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> index 69971c97b6..fccb6a6271 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> @@ -968,6 +957,50 @@ int libxl__domain_config_setdefault(libxl__gc *gc,
>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> LIBXL_PASSTHROUGH_UNKNOWN (aka "ENABLED" in an earlier uncommitted
> version of this code) is doing double duty. We actually need all of
> the following to be specificable:
> * default ("unknown"): enable PT iff we have devices to
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
