[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PV framebuffer

2006-11-24 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Hi, Markus I checked your fixes. It seems fine in source code base. I will run the test next week. Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Hi Atsushi, Could you give my latest patch a try on IA-64? I didn't merge your patch literally, so I might have broken it. Cheers, Markus

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq

2006-11-24 Thread Xu, Anthony
Keir Fraser write on 2006年11月24日 17:47: On 24/11/06 07:08, Xu, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is for comments, and it is based on IPF, it may not apply to IA32 side. This patch delivers interrupt and IO finish in the same hypercall xc_hvm_set_irq_and_wakeup_cpu, This

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq

2006-11-24 Thread Xu, Anthony
Keir Fraser write on 2006年11月24日 23:29: On 24/11/06 14:45, Xu, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until now, I can't see hypercall is faster than share PIC line. Can you enlighten me why we use hypercall? I didn't change it for speed but because it's cleaner. I believe it can be made no