Hi Isaku,
Latest IPF Cset has the xen bug#1253, which has been fixed by
xen-unstable Cset#17682
(http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/4b4b829e34a2). Could
you please merge it in the next Cset? Thank you!
Bug#1253: summary is The saved domain with qcow image cannot be
restored.
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Hi Jes.
Good catch.
I thought similar fix is necessary for xen/ia64 and checked the code.
It was fixed differently. I think the unnecessary divergence is undesirable.
What do you think the following fix according?
Hi Isaku,
I tried this fix for KVM, but it didn't work
Hi jingke:
Pls copy a newest RPM of XEN/IA64 and GFW you used to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/, I
can't open website of QA's building system.
Though Isaku work around it, I will root fix it.
Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
-Wing(zhang xin)
OTC,Intel Corporation
-Original Message-
From:
unnecessary divergence is
undesirable.
Good point, we should keep kvm/ia64 and xen/ia64 the same code base as
possible.
Anthony
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Hi Jes.
Good catch.
I thought similar fix is necessary for xen/ia64 and checked the code.
It was fixed differently. I think the
Xu, Anthony wrote:
unnecessary divergence is
undesirable.
Good point, we should keep kvm/ia64 and xen/ia64 the same code base as
possible.
It would be nice, but the KVM codebase has already been modified a lot,
just the reformatting in order to be acceptable to the Linux kernel. I
don't
Hi all,
All the cases passed in this Cset.
Detail Xen/IA64 Unstable Cset #17699 Status Report
Test Result Summary:
# total case: 17
# passed case: 17
# failed case: 0
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:36:59AM -0700, Paul Leisy wrote:
Hi Tristan,
Hi,
did I forget to reply ? Seems so.
Thank you for the comments. This really helps since I'm pretty new
to Xen. Here are more questions and assumptions I'm making:
I agree that it's important to know which PKR is
