On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:03:58PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
I'd rather have PARAVIRT_NR_IRQ set from Kconfig if possible given that
all of these are constants anyway. If we cannot do that, then it would
be better to do the #if FOO_NR_IRQ PARAVIRT_NR_IRQ in the various
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
I'd rather have PARAVIRT_NR_IRQ set from Kconfig if possible given that
all of these are constants anyway. If we cannot do that, then it would
be better to do the #if FOO_NR_IRQ PARAVIRT_NR_IRQ in the various
header files for Xen/KVM/lguest so we don't get the clutter in
Make NR_IRQ overridable by each pv instances.
Pv instance may need each own number of irqs so that
NR_IRQS should be the maximum number of nr_irqs each
pv instances need.
This really looks dodgy.
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
+
+/* Determine the maximal NR_IRQ which each pv instances require.
+ *
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:08:22AM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Make NR_IRQ overridable by each pv instances.
Pv instance may need each own number of irqs so that
NR_IRQS should be the maximum number of nr_irqs each
pv instances need.
This really looks dodgy.
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
I'm willing to introduce something like PARAVIRT_NR_IRQS,
but I don't see how PARAVIRT_NR_IRQS solves the issues.
What I want here is to define by cpp
#define PARAVIRT_NR_IRQS\
max(
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:05:59PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
I'm willing to introduce something like PARAVIRT_NR_IRQS,
but I don't see how PARAVIRT_NR_IRQS solves the issues.
What I want here is to define by cpp
#define PARAVIRT_NR_IRQS
