Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch][RFC] remove panic_domain inguest_write_eoi() for kexec on HVM

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:29:53AM +0900, Akio Takebe wrote: Hi, Alex, Horms Sorry for my late responce. What do you think about it? The panic does seem a bit much, but shouldn't we return rather than continue on with a NULL_VECTOR? Thanks, Yes, I also thik so. I'll post the new

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch][RFC] remove panic_domain inguest_write_eoi() for kexec on HVM

Hi, Horms On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:29:53AM +0900, Akio Takebe wrote: Hi, Alex, Horms Sorry for my late responce. What do you think about it? The panic does seem a bit much, but shouldn't we return rather than continue on with a NULL_VECTOR? Thanks, Yes, I also thik so. I'll post

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch][RFC] remove panic_domain inguest_write_eoi() for kexec on HVM

Hi, Alex, Horms Sorry for my late responce. What do you think about it? The panic does seem a bit much, but shouldn't we return rather than continue on with a NULL_VECTOR? Thanks, Yes, I also thik so. I'll post the new patch. I'm yet debugging kexec/kdump on HVM. I have a question, could