Hi Keir,
The CS# 17131 which I write for bind guest to NUMA node via cpu affinity
missed one condition existing in some machines, where there aren't any
cpus but only memories. Under this condition it will fail to set
cpu_affinity because of none parameter. I cope with this condition in
the new
Either are fine.
-Original Message-
From: Isaku Yamahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2008年3月19日 10:45
To: Dong, Eddie
Cc: Alex Williamson; xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: simplify hw_irq.h
Hi Eddie.
Thank you for the patches.
ia64_vector is for iosapic redirect
Followup patch to delete dead file then.
Thanks, eddie
entry32.patch
Description: entry32.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Hi,
move_to_psr need to unset the bits.
Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
fix_vcpu_set_psr_l.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Hi,
we should not set psr.ic at setting psr.i.
Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
fix_vcpu_set_psr_i.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
we should not set psr.ic at setting psr.i.
I think it was not wrong. You can't set psr.i without setting psr.ic. So
at least, this was harmless.
As this is an hyperprivop, the correct behaviour should be checked with linux
sources.
Tristan.
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
move_to_psr need to unset the bits.
Why not ispr-xxx = newpsr-xxx ? Seems simpler.
Tristan.
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Hi, Tristan
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
we should not set psr.ic at setting psr.i.
I think it was not wrong. You can't set psr.i without setting psr.ic. So
at least, this was harmless.
If so, should we check the psr.ic, and return something like Illegal Operation
if
Hi, Tristan
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
move_to_psr need to unset the bits.
Why not ispr-xxx = newpsr-xxx ? Seems simpler.
It's a good idea. I'll update it.
Best Regards,
Aki Takebe
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Hi,
I updated it.
I tested boot+shutdown dom0/domU.
Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
Hi, Tristan
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
move_to_psr need to unset the bits.
Why not ispr-xxx = newpsr-xxx ? Seems simpler.
It's a good idea. I'll
Hi,
This patch fixes a different behavior from the original code.
We need to set psr.ac.
I tested boot+shutdown dom0/domU.
Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
fix_set_psr_ac.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I updated it.
Haven't you changed the behaviour of dfh:
From
- if (newpsr.dfh) {
- ipsr-dfh = 1;
- PSCB(vcpu, vpsr_dfh) = 1;
- } else {
- ipsr-dfh = PSCB(vcpu, hpsr_dfh);
-
Hi, Tristan
Quoting Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I updated it.
Haven't you changed the behaviour of dfh:
From
- if (newpsr.dfh) {
- ipsr-dfh = 1;
- PSCB(vcpu, vpsr_dfh) = 1;
- } else {
- ipsr-dfh = PSCB(vcpu, hpsr_dfh);
-
Alex/Isaku:
Current the make file is to compile additional ivt.S at
kernel/., another approach is to compile in xen/..
The later one has following benfit:
1: Easy to read for Makefile and easy to extend for more
hypervisors.
2: Xen specific ministate.h can be in
Hi,
this patch changes the SIOEMU callback interface. The old method was
flawed: the callback data were lost if occuring during an hypercall.
This new interface is not backward compatible. I think it is not an issue
since sioemu is not widely deployed.
As currently committed, the sioemu fw
15 matches
Mail list logo
