On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Yes, it is not SMP-safe there is lock for p2m.
Modifying p2m is not a frequent operation, why not add a lock for it?
It is frequent to read p2m
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Yes, it is not SMP-safe there is lock for p2m.
Modifying p2m is not a frequent operation, why not add a lock for
it?
It is
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:30:50PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Yes, it is not SMP-safe there is lock for p2m.
Modifying p2m
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:30:50PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Yes, it is not SMP-safe there is lock for
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:50:40PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:30:50PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:56:05PM
The new one,
I applies manually #Cset 18649 -- 18653 in xen-devel tree on #Cset 18637.
Tested by booting rhel5.1 guest.
Please pull xen-devel tree and apply this patch.
I'll send out other patches soon.
Thanks
Anthony
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Hi Anthony.
With the following 3 patches applied,
Applied, thanks.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:17:00PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Updated one per your comments
Thanks,
Anthony
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:02:08AM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Add head files and helper functions for VTD/ia64.
Signed-off-by; Anthony
Applied, thanks.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:49:27AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
IA64: update ia64 px info transfer corresponding to x86 px info update.
In x86 side, there is a new patch to solve platform hypercall compatible
issue result from px info transfer.
This patch update ia64 px info
Applied, thanks.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:12:29PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
The new one,
I applies manually #Cset 18649 -- 18653 in xen-devel tree on #Cset 18637.
Tested by booting rhel5.1 guest.
Please pull xen-devel tree and apply this patch.
I'll send out other patches soon.
Thanks
Hi Keir,
Please pull the ia64 trees:
http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/ia64/xen-unstable.hg
http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/ia64/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
This includes the ones which fixes compilation breakage and
VT-d preliminary patches from Anthony Xu.
Thanks,
--
yamahata
dom0/ia64/vtd patch
Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dom0_vtd.patch
Description: dom0_vtd.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
The new one,
-if (phy_pte.ma != VA_MATTR_NATPAGE)
+/* if a device is assigned to a domain through VTD, the MMIO
for this + * device needs to retain to UC attribute
+ */
+if (phy_pte.ma == VA_MATTR_WC)
phy_pte.ma = VA_MATTR_WB;
Doesn't this break the
Hi Anthony,
Xu, Anthony writes:
-if (phy_pte.ma != VA_MATTR_NATPAGE)
+/* if a device is assigned to a domain through VTD, the MMIO
for this + * device needs to retain to UC attribute
+ */
+if (phy_pte.ma == VA_MATTR_WC)
phy_pte.ma = VA_MATTR_WB;
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:43:13PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
dom0/ia64/vtd patch
Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In XEN_DOMCTL_get_device_group case.
struct xen_domctl_get_device_group {
uint32_t machine_bdf; /* IN */
uint32_t max_sdevs;/* IN */
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:35:36PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
The new one,
-if (phy_pte.ma != VA_MATTR_NATPAGE)
+/* if a device is assigned to a domain through VTD, the MMIO
for this + * device needs to retain to UC attribute
+ */
+if (phy_pte.ma == VA_MATTR_WC)
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:03:55AM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:35:36PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
The new one,
-if (phy_pte.ma != VA_MATTR_NATPAGE)
+/* if a device is assigned to a domain through VTD, the MMIO
for this + *
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:03:55AM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:35:36PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
The new one,
-if (phy_pte.ma != VA_MATTR_NATPAGE)
+/* if a device is assigned to a domain through VTD, the MMIO
for
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:31:20AM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Iommu_un/map_page does nothing for PV domain.
Why is there a race?
Oh sorry. I'm not very familiar with iommu code (yet).
My understanding is
iommu_domain_init() is called unconditionaly by arch_domain_create()
so that
Hi Isaku,
We checked the stub-domain in x86 side, basically it works well for
booting, smp, and memory (only some issues on save-restore).
I remember we did not support stub-domain for resource limit. Do you have
new plan to let IA64-Xen support it? Or is ia64 stub-domain available now?
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:31:20AM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Iommu_un/map_page does nothing for PV domain.
Why is there a race?
Oh sorry. I'm not very familiar with iommu code (yet).
My understanding is
iommu_domain_init() is called unconditionaly by
Xu, Anthony wrote:
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:31:20AM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
Iommu_un/map_page does nothing for PV domain.
Why is there a race?
Oh sorry. I'm not very familiar with iommu code (yet).
My understanding is
iommu_domain_init() is called unconditionaly
P2M entry may change from _PAGE_IO to real MMIO page
Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
enhancement_assign_page.patch
Description: enhancement_assign_page.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Hi shimura
I only tested in old version 18134.
I can reproduce it.
And I find another way to handle it,
Will send out patch soon.
Thanks,
anthony
Kouya Shimura wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Xu, Anthony writes:
-if (phy_pte.ma != VA_MATTR_NATPAGE)
+/* if a device is assigned to a domain
A small fix in mm.c
mfn_valid makes sure it is a normal page
Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
small_fix_mm.patch
Description: small_fix_mm.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
