[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Xen common code across architecture

2008-03-25 Thread Dong, Eddie
Dong, Eddie wrote: Jeremy/Andrew: Isaku Yamahata, I and some other IA64/Xen community memebers are working together to enable pv_ops for IA64 Linux. This patch is a preparation to move common arch/x86/xen/events.c to drivers/xen (contents are identical) against mm tree, it is

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [patch 00/11] ia64: kexec: Map EFI memory in the same location as Linux (v20080320)

2008-03-25 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:05:26PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 15:52 +0900, Simon Horman wrote: Hi, here is another spin of the kexec EFI patches. I think we are getting very close if we aren't there already. Hi Simon, Have you tried launching an HVM

[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][OpenGFW] Fix bug in the Boot Maintenance Manager

2008-03-25 Thread SUZUKI Kazuhiro
Hi Tristan, I found a bug in the Boot Maintenance Manager. When we select `Input the description' or `Input Optional Data' after the boot option is added, the guest domain panics. The following patch fixes it. Thanks, KAZ Signed-off-by: Kazuhiro Suzuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] fix_popup.patch.bz2

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17292 Status Report

2008-03-25 Thread Mu, Qin
Xen/IA64 Unstable Cset #17292 Status Report = Issue: Failed to boot up Windows Server 2003 Guest HVM = Test Result Summary: # total case: 18 # passed

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17292 Status Report

2008-03-25 Thread Akio Takebe
Hi, Amy Failed case id Description SMPVTI_Windows SMPVTI windows(vcpu=2) SMPWin_SMPVTI_SMPxenU SMPVTI Linux/Windows XenU VTI_Windows_PV Windows VTI PV If my patch(17292) is revert, can you boot Windows

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17292 Status Report

2008-03-25 Thread Alex Williamson
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:56 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote: Hi, Amy Failed case id Description SMPVTI_Windows SMPVTI windows(vcpu=2) SMPWin_SMPVTI_SMPxenU SMPVTI Linux/Windows XenU VTI_Windows_PV

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: move IO type to ppn (VTi)

2008-03-25 Thread Alex Williamson
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 06:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Instead of using 3 extra bits in pte to store the io type, only one bit is used to mark the page as an IO page and the type is stored in the ppn field. This both save 2 bits and allow many more io types. Move the VTi memory

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] linux: need to set psr.ac inpage_fault

2008-03-25 Thread Alex Williamson
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:08 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote: Ah, It's redundant. I remove the ifdef. PSR_DEFAULT_BITS is always defined. And even if PSR_DEFAULT_BITS == 0, sum 0x0 is harmless. Applied. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Open Source Linux

[Xen-ia64-devel] PATCH: move IO type to ppn [v2]

2008-03-25 Thread tgingold
Hi, I have fixed the ioemu build. (For ref: Instead of using 3 extra bits in pte to store the io type, only one bit is used to mark the page as an IO page and the type is stored in the ppn field. This both save 2 bits and allow many more io types. Move the VTi memory map to