Re: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Alex Williamson
Applied. -- Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

RE: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tian, Kevin
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:48 >> >> >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:01 >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 05:29, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >> >> >> >Just a comment: why LID is not virtualized? >> >> >> >This is required as soon as we want to do VCPU migrat

Re: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:41, Tian, Kevin a écrit : > From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:43 > > > >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:35, Tian, Kevin a écrit : > >> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:38 > >> > > >> >Le V

RE: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tian, Kevin
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:43 >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:35, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:38 >> > >> >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:30, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >> >> From: Tristan Gingo

Re: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:35, Tian, Kevin a écrit : > From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:38 > > > >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:30, Tian, Kevin a écrit : > >> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:01 > >> > > >> >Le V

RE: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tian, Kevin
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:38 > >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:30, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:01 >> > >> >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 05:29, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >> >Just a comment: why

Re: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:30, Tian, Kevin a écrit : > From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:01 > > > >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 05:29, Tian, Kevin a écrit : > >Just a comment: why LID is not virtualized? > >This is required as soon as we want to do VCPU migrati

RE: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-21 Thread Tian, Kevin
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:01 > >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 05:29, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >Just a comment: why LID is not virtualized? >This is required as soon as we want to do VCPU migration! > Yes, LID needs to be virtualized. Shouldn't that be included

Re: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 05:29, Tian, Kevin a écrit : Just a comment: why LID is not virtualized? This is required as soon as we want to do VCPU migration! Tristan. ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xenso

[PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Tian, Kevin
Thanks, Kevin >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Tian, Kevin >Sent: 2006年4月21日 11:12 >To: Alex Williamson >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops &

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Tian, Kevin
>From: Alex Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 10:51 > >On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 17:01 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >> 2. This patch has no obvious performance influence (Why >> I say 'obvious' is because latest p2m tree seems not very >> stable even without this patch. The output d

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Alex Williamson
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 17:01 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote: > 2. This patch has no obvious performance influence (Why > I say 'obvious' is because latest p2m tree seems not very > stable even without this patch. The output drifts with -10-+10% > range... It's also possible due to my test environment.

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Tian, Kevin
>From: Isaku Yamahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 9:30 > > > >diff -r 7ed4420aac6b -r e6bffdbbd0e2 xen/arch/ia64/xen/hypercall.c >--- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/hypercall.c Thu Apr 20 02:05:24 2006 >+++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/hypercall.c Thu Apr 20 03:08:42 2006 > >- (hypercall_

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Isaku Yamahata
diff -r 7ed4420aac6b -r e6bffdbbd0e2 xen/arch/ia64/xen/hypercall.c --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/hypercall.c Thu Apr 20 02:05:24 2006 +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/hypercall.c Thu Apr 20 03:08:42 2006 - (hypercall_t)do_ni_hypercall, /* do_physdev_op */ + (hypercall_t)do_ni_hype

[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops

2006-04-20 Thread Tian, Kevin
Add support to physdev ops, and thus give IOSAPIC RTEs managed by Xen now. Dom0 now issues hypercall to r/w RTE entry. Another change is the irq vector allocation which is also owned by xen now. After this change, the IOSAPIC is almost owned by xen with only exception as IOSAPIC EOI which is still