On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 14:32 +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
I remake my patch and should send it again? Or, at first you apply
my patch to xen-ia64-unstable tree, and do I send a patch setting
page size later?
Hi Kan,
I already applied your first patch since it's still correct to use
smaller
?24? 19:39
To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove FORCE_CRASH from alt_itlb_miss
Hi,
This patch removed FORCE_CRASH from alt_itlb_miss handler.
Signed-off-by: Masaki Kanno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Kan
Le Mardi 25 Avril 2006 17:27, Masaki Kanno a écrit :
Hi Anthony,
Please teach me in detail.
I applied this patch and FPSWA supporting patch to Xen and tested it.
Because I ran LTP on dom0, and a test about a floating point succeeded,
I sent this patch.
Anthony's patch is for VT-i...
From: Masaki Kanno
Sent: 2006?4?25? 23:27
To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove FORCE_CRASH from alt_itlb_miss
Hi Anthony,
Please teach me in detail.
For supporting discontinuous memory, ps in region register is always 16K,
There are two implicit
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove FORCE_CRASH from alt_itlb_miss
Hi Anthony,
Please teach me in detail.
For supporting discontinuous memory, ps in region register is always 16K,
There are two implicit parameters for itc instruction,
The other is cr.ifa indicating fault virtual address.
One
Hi,
This patch removed FORCE_CRASH from alt_itlb_miss handler.
Signed-off-by: Masaki Kanno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Kan
remove_FORCE_CRASH.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
