On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 13:13 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:58:20PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
I think we need some error checking in that path.
The domain should probably panic if such fundamental hypercalls are
unavailable.
The patch is attached.
Applied.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:58:20PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Quick update. Still some user error on my part here. I was trying
to boot a p2m/vp kernel w/ a non-p2m/vp xen. The failure was because
the ioremap was returning -ENOSYS, which we happily tried to use as the
ioremapped
Hi, Kevin
I'm sorry. I tried again.
I can boot up with VP off.
I have a mistake(I used old kernel(2.6.16-xen)).
My auto build scripts was stupid...
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
Hi, Akio,
I just tried the tip (9992) and succeed with creating dom0/domU.
Do you make a fresh compile upon the
From: Alex Williamson
Sent: 2006年5月11日 0:23
- Does xen reboot after the above messages or just be silent?
It seems that something occurs somewhere in acpi_boot_init() of
linux/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c.
Could you track it down more?
It MCAs at this point. The error record indicates a
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 10:52 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
Have to say it's bad news. When I turned on
xen_ia64_dom0_virtual_physical in xen, it halts even before starting
dom0. Based on tip (Rev 9992). Maybe we should try this feature later
when all patch sets are checked in. :-(
Hi Kevin,
Hi,
I have the following error with default config.
Does everyone have the same?
cset #9992.
SAL 0.1: Xen/ia64 Xen/ia64 version 0.0
SAL: AP wakeup using external interrupt vector 0xf3
xen_pal_emulator: UNIMPLEMENTED PAL CALL 42
(XEN) No logical to physical processor mapping available
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 12:41 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Here is the patch.
Isaku,
I only applied the first 2 chunks of this patch. The rest seems to
be patching code that doesn't yet exist. This fixes the build problem,
but I can't boot with a XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP=y xenlinux kernel. It
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:11:09PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
I only applied the first 2 chunks of this patch. The rest seems to
be patching code that doesn't yet exist. This fixes the build problem,
but I can't boot with a XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP=y xenlinux kernel. It fails
booting dom0
To: You, Yongkang
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: [PATCH] compilation fix of ia64 hypervisor.c,utils.c (was Re:
[Xen-ia64-devel] latest tree building fail.)
Here is the patch.
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:31:24AM +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
Hi all,
The latest Cset 9968 has problem
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:53 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
Hi, Isaku,
Should people disable CONFIG_XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP when
compiling xenlinux now? Does it still work without applying your rest
patch set?
FWIW, I was testing with CONFIG_XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP=n, so didn't see this
problem.
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:53:40AM +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
Should people disable CONFIG_XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP when
compiling xenlinux now?
Yes.
Does it still work without applying your rest
patch set?
Yes.
I tested compilation and dom0/domU boot with CONFIG_XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP=y.
However
11 matches
Mail list logo
