Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 4/9] [P2M/VP step 1] xen: domain0 builder change

2006-04-25 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Mardi 25 Avril 2006 06:12, Isaku Yamahata a écrit : 4 / 9 Two possible problems (we may fix them later): * should ACPI be copied instead of mapped ? At least some ACPI tables must be duplicated to other IO domains. * We must be sure that only physical memory 4GB is mapped below 4 GB in

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 4/9] [P2M/VP step 1] xen: domain0 builder change

2006-04-25 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hi Tristan. Thank you for your comment. On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 05:25:10PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: Le Mardi 25 Avril 2006 06:12, Isaku Yamahata a écrit : 4 / 9 Two possible problems (we may fix them later): * should ACPI be copied instead of mapped ? At least some ACPI tables must