Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-07 Thread KUWAMURA Shin'ya
Hi Zhang, On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:54:13 +0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED](Zhang, Jingke) said: 2. With 4096M, VTI can not boot up emulated rtl8139 network-card 3. With 4095M, qemu of VTI guest will disappear when booting Could you try the attached patch of tools/ioemu-remote? With it, both

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-07 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hi. I modified ia64 hvm domain builder to calculate more precisely. So not only MMIO hole (1GB), but also VGA io hole (VGA_IO_SIZE) should be taken into consideration. thanks, On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:50:26PM +0900, KUWAMURA Shin'ya wrote: Hi Zhang, On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:54:13 +0800

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-07 Thread KUWAMURA Shin'ya
Hi, On [EMAIL PROTECTED], Isaku Yamahata wrote: I modified ia64 hvm domain builder to calculate more precisely. So not only MMIO hole (1GB), but also VGA io hole (VGA_IO_SIZE) should be taken into consideration. OK. I will add VGA_IO_SIZE. Best regards, -- KUWAMURA Shin'ya

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-07 Thread KUWAMURA Shin'ya
Hi, On [EMAIL PROTECTED], Isaku Yamahata wrote: So not only MMIO hole (1GB), but also VGA io hole (VGA_IO_SIZE) should be taken into consideration. I added VGA_IO_SIZE. I confirmed that a VTi domain with 4095MB booted up and the rtl8139 NIC worked. Best regards, -- KUWAMURA Shin'ya diff

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-07 Thread Zhang, Jingke
KUWAMURA Shin'ya wrote: Hi, On [EMAIL PROTECTED], Isaku Yamahata wrote: So not only MMIO hole (1GB), but also VGA io hole (VGA_IO_SIZE) should be taken into consideration. I added VGA_IO_SIZE. I confirmed that a VTi domain with 4095MB booted up and the rtl8139 NIC worked. Best

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-07 Thread KUWAMURA Shin'ya
Hi, On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:31:09 +0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED](Zhang, Jingke) said: With the patch on CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384..., the two issues can be fixed! I also rerun the whole test, no regression. Thanks! Thank you for your testing! I will post it to xen-devel ML.

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-06 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:25:50PM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Isaku Yamahata wrote: ... Ah, I'm using patched GFW. I sent out two patches as http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00067.html

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-05 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Hi all, There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old issues still existed. Old issue (3): 1. Qemu will disappear and VTI hangs when we do 'xm restore' and 'xm migrate' Hi. Does this still exist? The

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-05 Thread Zhang, Jingke
Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Hi all, There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old issues still existed. Old issue (3): 1. Qemu will disappear and VTI hangs when we do 'xm restore' and 'xm migrate' Hi. Does

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-05 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:16:02AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Hi all, There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old issues still existed. Old issue (3): 1. Qemu will

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue

2008-10-05 Thread Zhang, Jingke
Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:16:02AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Hi all, There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old issues still existed. Old issue (3): 1.