[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [POWERPC] workaround for broken claim is insufficient

2006-08-18 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID 7855f2e8074882ae27ac2e2a700124bcc3f9c579 # Parent d16b31d3998a29adeea7bb6f892636181ae6eaf4 [POWERPC] workaround for broken claim is insufficient Ifdef'ed out so we can revisit, maybe. Also add a check to make sure we allocated

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [POWERPC] Boot Module freeing

2006-08-18 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID bcba998e95575602fe3953bdc5ee19bc383740bc # Parent b10e48a5d1e3b8a14619f52a09851f20769a46cc [POWERPC] Boot Module freeing - Fix bad logic that frees the modules anyway. - Allow for the absence of a Dom0 to continue exectution

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [POWERPC] remove test lines that snuck in

2006-08-18 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID 0af18fd083ed3d09784a7b2b86517557cf91b73d # Parent 7855f2e8074882ae27ac2e2a700124bcc3f9c579 [POWERPC] remove test lines that snuck in --- xen/arch/powerpc/setup.c |2 -- 1 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff -r 7855f2e80748

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [POWERPC] Enable gcc -Wshadow and fix the warnings

2006-08-18 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID b10e48a5d1e3b8a14619f52a09851f20769a46cc # Parent 0af18fd083ed3d09784a7b2b86517557cf91b73d [POWERPC] Enable gcc -Wshadow and fix the warnings As sugested by: Amos Waterland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [XenPPC] Xencomm for xen/ia64

2006-08-18 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 11:04 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: Le Jeudi 17 Août 2006 20:35, Hollis Blanchard a écrit : If we agree on using xencomm we will have to work with xen/ppc people in order not to duplicate the code. Hopefully it is rather small. I have enhanced the xencomm code

[XenPPC] Xencomm on ia64 - The patches

2006-08-18 Thread Tristan Gingold
Hi, these are the patches to port xencomm on ia64. This is just an RFC. I have to clean-up the code so that it could be shared between ia64 and ppc. I have added the xencomm_inline feature which makes (IMHO) hcall.c more readable and safer (particularly at boot time). Wether or not

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [POWERPC][TOOLS] sync with start_info_t changes

2006-08-18 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID 4b028786b67e720e8b36b2d9dda0184a09b1f661 # Parent 66cd49a0e239c4ba20a493b8743e712dcaae0391 [POWERPC][TOOLS] sync with start_info_t changes Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [POWERPC] add missing vga components

2006-08-18 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID 227c65d72a657360a8373eeffaa602ee8a3cee8f # Parent 4b028786b67e720e8b36b2d9dda0184a09b1f661 [POWERPC] add missing vga components --- xen/arch/powerpc/setup.c |1 + xen/include/asm-powerpc/io.h |2 ++ 2 files changed,

[XenPPC] breakage

2006-08-18 Thread Jimi Xenidis
domain building does not work do not update.. I'll fix it ASAP -JX ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] [PATCH] Init secondary processors up to assigning r13 (respin)

2006-08-18 Thread Amos Waterland
Respin because the -Wshadow portion went in today. Re-tested on systemsim-gpul with up to four simulated processors, Maple-D with two processors, JS20 with two processors, and JS21 with four processors. This patch brings the secondary processors up to the point where they have a per-processor

Re: [XenPPC] xm and xend use

2006-08-18 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:47 -0400, Maria Butrico wrote: Are there debug option of any sort for these two? debug build options? Debug messages are logged to /var/log/xend.log and /var/log/xend-debug.log. PS: Send more memory, anytime. Do you mean xend is slow? If so, I heartily agree. It's