[XenPPC] Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Using "make install" causes a distro specific script

2007-09-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 07:46 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:14 +0100, Xen staging patchbot-unstable wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Ian Campbell > > # Date 1190200369 -3600 > > # Node ID 202153d094d883be1d8567031f

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1.1 -- initial patchqueue

2007-09-10 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 08:48 -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: > Keir Fraser wrote: > > We're using mercurial patchqueues. Mercurial version 0.9.1. I've just cloned > > and applied the patch queue from scratch with no problems. > > > > -- Keir > > > Perhaps it is a regression in the behavior of hg? I am

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] new repo layout?

2007-06-18 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:40 -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > Any chance you can wire up the email notifications again? I'd gladly do so if I had even the foggiest clue how. I'd assumed there would be a hook in .hg/hgrc, ~/.hgrc or /etc/hgrc but I can't find anything of the sort anywhere on xenbits.

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] new repo layout?

2007-06-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:15 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > This way we'll end up with common names like: > > > > /xen-unstable.hg > > /linux-2.6.18-xen.hg > > /staging/xen-unstable.hg > > /staging/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg > > /ext/ia64/xen-unstable.hg > > /ext/ia64/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg > > > > Soun

[XenPPC] Exporting native protocol ABI from domain builder

2007-05-15 Thread Ian Campbell
a64be, does the driver do the byte swapping itself or is a new protocol string required? In the absence of any mixed mode support on your platforms it's harmless to not apply but if you think it makes sense please go ahead. Ian. [BUILDER] Define native protocol ABI for IA64 guests. Signed-

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch] make ELF functions static

2006-08-30 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 30.08.06 09:03 >>> > >On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 16:15 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > >> Hi Ian, these functions should be static. It would only be a style issue &g

[XenPPC] Re: [patch] make ELF functions static

2006-08-30 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 16:15 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Hi Ian, these functions should be static. It would only be a style issue > except PowerPC actually #includes elf.c twice, to support both 32- and > 64-bit ELF binaries. Please apply. Unfortunately they are referenced from outside this fi