Re: [PATCH] Re: [XenPPC] XenPPC: redundancy definition of __trap_to_gdb with CRASH_DEBUG

2006-10-04 Thread Jimi Xenidis
I think hollis nailed correctly, does it work for everyone? # HG changeset patch # User Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID c3312bbd598a50b3c48955a8f4c9dba6330fc7d8 # Parent d1f6d0f820d890ac6075f47ad1ba6e38012167b4 [POWERPC][XEN] Move gmfn_to_mfn() from page.h to mm.h to avoid

Re: [PATCH] Re: [XenPPC] XenPPC: redundancy definition of __trap_to_gdb with CRASH_DEBUG

2006-10-04 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:36:08AM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote: I think hollis nailed correctly, does it work for everyone? Works for me. Yours Tony linux.conf.au http://linux.conf.au/ || http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ Jan 15-20 2007 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!

Re: [PATCH] Re: [XenPPC] XenPPC: redundancy definition of __trap_to_gdb with CRASH_DEBUG

2006-10-04 Thread Amos Waterland
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:52:39PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:36:08AM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote: I think hollis nailed correctly, does it work for everyone? Works for me. Did you try building with debug=y, then with debug=n, with no intervening `make clean'?

Re: [PATCH] Re: [XenPPC] XenPPC: redundancy definition of __trap_to_gdb with CRASH_DEBUG

2006-10-04 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:57:45PM -0400, Amos Waterland wrote: Did you try building with debug=y, then with debug=n, with no intervening `make clean'? Yup. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Xen/xenppc-unstable.hg.working$ history | egrep dist-xen snip Older stuff 562 make clean; PATH=/usr/bin:/bin

[PATCH] Re: [XenPPC] XenPPC: redundancy definition of __trap_to_gdb with CRASH_DEBUG

2006-10-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:56:14PM -0400, Amos Waterland wrote: I'm not positive of this, but I'm pretty sure that this is caused by improper dependency checking. I suspect that you changed from debug=n to debug=y and got this. I'd suggest doing a `make clean' and trying again without