[XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [POWEPRC] new default config

2006-08-08 Thread Xen patchbot-linux-ppc-2 . 6
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID e4a11039ee9ec7b0b728981fc7b0a6c0c972b0e4 # Parent dbc5fdc3a38251f8a11eb442c6e9139b36e02e54 [POWEPRC] new default config --- arch/powerpc/configs/xen_maple_defconfig | 18 -- 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+),

[XenPPC] architecture-specific stuff in xend

2006-08-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
Hi Ewan, I'm almost ready to integrate some PPC-specific stuff into xend, and I was wondering if you had a plan for how that should work. First example: the device tree data structure we talked about a few weeks ago. We will need to pass the config data to PPC code, probably in

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] architecture-specific stuff in xend

2006-08-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:59 +0100, John Levon wrote: On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:34:25AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: Rather than having these inline tests everywhere (if os.uname()[4] in ('ia64', 'ppc64'):), would it make more sense to have some sort of architecture object, and do

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] architecture-specific stuff in xend

2006-08-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:15:18AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Solaris some of the Xen binaries/scripts live in different locations in order to meet our file system requirements. Does that impact code under tools/python/xen much? Very little, but it does affect the location of the

[XenPPC] Re: [RFC] consolidated libdt proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Mark A. Greer
Hi Hollis, On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:58:41PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 19:38 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: Hmm, so we'll have at least three copies of this code: uboot, kernel, and Xen. Would it make sense to put this stuff into a libdt.a? Technically, dtc

[XenPPC] XenPPC IEEE1275 binding?

2006-08-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
I remember seeing some mention of it, but I don't think we currently have an IEEE1275 binding describing the contents of the /xen node. I'm currently doing the device tree work to fill that in, and we're going to replace the start_info struct we're currently using, so now would be a good time.

Re: [XenPPC] Fw: latest noHV patches

2006-08-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
Hi Mark, I've put up a brief description at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPPC/NoHV ; feel free to edit and expand if you like. Also, in the future please name patches (i.e. xen-nohv and linux-prlp) with a .diff extension. That makes them much easier to read in email clients and list

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXC] add architecture-specific parameter to xc_linux_build()

2006-08-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 15:28 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: diff -r 375fb1f773c5 -r e74340460b8c tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c --- a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c Tue Aug 08 15:11:25 2006 -0500 +++ b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c Tue Aug 08 15:17:24 2006 -0500 @@ -331,25