Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Disable DPM until code is audited

2006-12-02 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Dec 2, 2006, at 2:37 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Do not set the NAP and DPM bits in HID0 until we have had a chance to audit the safe halt and idle loop code. Not setting these bits allows the model 884241X JS20 blade in TRL to boot correctly, and possibly also the Maple in YKT.

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [XEN][POWERPC] should comment the Power Managment workaround in the code as well

2006-12-02 Thread Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Node ID 0e85b389980ad1a4d135773d807825d91a94ae9c # Parent 4f4b8cbcf3bf22ce2d0ff2b2e6589a054a1840fa [XEN][POWERPC] should comment the Power Managment workaround in the code as well Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Disable DPM until code is audited

2006-12-02 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Dec 2, 2006, at 2:37 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: My question remains: did you try with NAP disabled and DPM enabled? I see, so: HID0[NAP]=1 HID0[DPM]=1 MSR[POW]=1 is NAP and is different than: HID0[NAP]=0 HID0[DPM]=1

Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Disable DPM until code is audited

2006-12-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Most JS20 and JS21 have DPM disabled on the board, What does this mean? SLOF/js2x enables DPM always, for example; there is no hardware override that I'm aware of. According to S9.9 of 970FX UM: Dynamic power management can be disabled in the RAS units by asserting bit[0] in the JTAG