[XenPPC] [PATCH] Generalized parallel IPI handlers

2006-11-28 Thread Amos Waterland
Our problem with x86 do_IRQ is that it does not respect IRQ_PER_CPU, so make our logic reflect that generically. We remove the spin lock in this case, since the programming convention is to update irq descs atomically (if at all). This patch allows read_clocks to work properly. Signed-off-by:

Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Generalized parallel IPI handlers

2006-11-28 Thread Jimi Xenidis
pushed, thanks! -JX On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Amos Waterland wrote: Our problem with x86 do_IRQ is that it does not respect IRQ_PER_CPU, so make our logic reflect that generically. We remove the spin lock in this case, since the programming convention is to update irq descs atomically (if