On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:54:47PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> I don't see how we'd ever hit this case though, nor why we'd panic the
> domain. How could paddr_to_maddr() ever return an maddr that doesn't
> belong to the current domain? If paddr is invalid, an error should be
> returned from t
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 17:44 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>
> +/* get_page() to prevent from another vcpu freeing the page */
> +static int
> +xencomm_paddr_to_maddr(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long *maddr,
> +struct page_info **page)
> +{
> +*maddr = paddr_to_maddr(paddr);
> +if
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:43:16AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:12 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:44 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > But we can issue seque
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:12 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:44 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > >
> > > > But we can issue sequential p2m hcalls with different offsets, so we
> > > do.
> > > > So what exa
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:44 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >
> > > But we can issue sequential p2m hcalls with different offsets, so we
> > do.
> > > So what exactly is the new problem?
> >
> > The limit is about 64GB for xen/ia6
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:44 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>
> > But we can issue sequential p2m hcalls with different offsets, so we
> do.
> > So what exactly is the new problem?
>
> The limit is about 64GB for xen/ia64 because xen/ia64 deafult page
> size
> is 16KB.
> The issue I'm seeing is the
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:07:54PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:36 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > remove xencomm page size limit.
> > Currently xencomm has page size limit so that a domain with many memory
> > (e.g. 100GB+) can't be created.
> > This patch allows that
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:36 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> remove xencomm page size limit.
> Currently xencomm has page size limit so that a domain with many memory
> (e.g. 100GB+) can't be created.
> This patch allows that the address array of struct xencomm_desc to cross
> page boundary so that t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:25:17PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>Should we make the same changes to the common xencomm files?
> (xen-ppc-devel CC'd) I don't see why we wouldn't, at least for this
> first one.
Yes, that's right.
I attached the updated one and the new patch for common xencom
Hi Isaku,
Should we make the same changes to the common xencomm files?
(xen-ppc-devel CC'd) I don't see why we wouldn't, at least for this
first one. How much memory have you been able to assign to a domain
with theses patches? My only nit on this patch is that the
from/to_ulong variables ar
10 matches
Mail list logo
