Re: [XenPPC] Track HID4[RM_CI] state for machine check

2006-09-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 02:10 +, Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable wrote: +static inline ulong read_scom(ulong addr) +{ +union scomc c; +ulong d; + +c.word = 0; +c.bits.addr = addr; +c.bits.RW = 0; Shouldn't RW = 1 for a read request? -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux

Re: [XenPPC] Track HID4[RM_CI] state for machine check

2006-09-08 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 02:10 +, Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable wrote: +static inline ulong read_scom(ulong addr) +{ +union scomc c; +ulong d; + +c.word = 0; +c.bits.addr = addr; +c.bits.RW = 0; Shouldn't RW = 1 for a