On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 17:16 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 16:18 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
Hey, wouldn't virt_addr_valid() do?
I can pass a perfectly valid virtual address that is within a
physically
On Jan 18, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:17 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
I agree with most of Hollis's comments, but have some of my own.
First, I do not think that the implementation of is_phys_contiguous()
answers the question in its name and IMNSHO is
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 16:18 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:17 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
I agree with most of Hollis's comments, but have some of my own.
First, I do not think that the implementation of
On Jan 18, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 16:18 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
Hey, wouldn't virt_addr_valid() do?
I can pass a perfectly valid virtual address that is within a
physically discontiguous area of memory, and this function would
return
0.
hmm,
I haven't had a chance to fully test this patch. As I have been having
problems with my blade today. But here is the code for review. I'll get
back to the list once it is fully tested.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -r e5962db17966 arch/powerpc/platforms/xen/gnttab.c
---
